debian-qa Jan 2008 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

---

Loïc Minier

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 03

Adeodato Simó

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02

Ana Guerrero

• Bug#461497: Mail maintainer when there is ubuntu patch Jan 19

Andreas Metzler

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 13

Andreas Tille

• Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled? Jan 09

atomo64

• Bug#356826: PTS: could e-mail when DEHS detects new upstream release Jan 22

Aurelien Jarno

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02

Barry deFreese

• Re: RFS: alml 2005.01.01-3 Jan 20
• RFS: alml 2005.01.01-3 Jan 19
• Re: RFS: Another QA Upload -- amavis-stats Jan 25
• RFS: QA Upload -- bazaar-docs Jan 26
• Re: RFS: QA Uploads Jan 26
• Re: RFS: QA Uploads Jan 25
• RFS: QA Upload -- oo2c - Massive restructuring Jan 25
• RFS: QA Upload - grokking-the-gimp Jan 25
• RFS: plr 1:8.2.0.7-3 Jan 19
• RFS: pydict (Updated package) Jan 17
• RFS: QA Uploads Jan 25
• Re: RFS: alml 2005.01.01-3 Jan 20
• Re: RFS: pydict (Updated package) Jan 17
• Re: RFS: QA Uploads Jan 26
• RFS: Another QA Upload -- amavis-stats Jan 25
• Re: Oldlibs transitions, and some old packages. (wx2.4) Jan 12
• Re: Oldlibs transitions, and some old packages. (wx2.4) Jan 07
• Re: RFS: QA Upload -- bazaar-docs Jan 29
• Re: RFS: plr 1:8.2.0.7-3 Jan 19
• Re: RFS: QA Uploads Jan 25
• Re: RFS: QA Upload -- bazaar-docs Jan 29
• Re: RFS: plr 1:8.2.0.7-3 Jan 19

Charles Plessy

• Bug#461047: qa.debian.org: For saving a few pixels… Jan 16

Clint Adams

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02

Colin Tuckley

• Bug#354307: http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pvm.html also affected, Jan 03

Colin Watson

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 11

Cyril Brulebois

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 11
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: RFS: QA Uploads Jan 26
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 11
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: RFS: zynaddsubfx Jan 09
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02

Debian Bug Tracking System

• Processed: Re: PTS: removed packages not considered when re-added to the archive Jan 24
• Bug#286177: marked as done (PTS: new version available flag) Jan 28
• Processed: retitle 461047 to DDPO: qa.debian.org: For saving a few pixels... Jan 24
• Bug#457152: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Accurately represent Bugs/Patches available in the Todo section of PTS page) Jan 26
• Bug#373218: marked as done (naming convention for lintian URLs is not in sync with lintian.d.o) Jan 07
• Processed: Re: Bug#461000: packages.qa.debian.org: Status report bug list only links to one bug Jan 17
• Processed: Re: Bug#460821: color wrong in watch column of xsel Jan 16
• Bug#457546: marked as done (PTS: Please display a swirl in the logo.) Jan 13
• Processed: New debian image with swirl for PTS page Jan 12
• Bug#332938: marked as done (PTS: integrate with dehs to allow adding a "package new upstream" TODO item) Jan 28
• Processed: retitle 412033 to extremely noisy when new package closes many bugs, reassign 412033 to debbugs Jan 24
• Bug#456276: marked as done (PTS: please link also to buildd logs for debian-ports) Jan 24
• Bug#463186: marked as done (PTS: should not list the same architecture more than once) Jan 30
• Bug#457190: marked as done (qa.debian.org: selecting default CSS layout for PTS) Jan 16
• Bug#398192: marked as done (PTS: does not show security uploads anymore under news) Jan 24
• Bug#400480: marked as done (PTS page for pmidi is reporting wrong info about upstream release) Jan 24
• Bug#367098: marked as done (PTS: bug summary should not count merged bugs twice) Jan 26
• Bug#195121: marked as done (PTS: show new upstream version available/integrate with dehs) Jan 28
• Bug#433933: marked as done (should not complain about ITPs of packages which are only in experimental) Jan 26
• Bug#437675: marked as done (Compare versions using the mangled Debian version string) Jan 06
• Bug#456434: marked as done (qa.debian.org/developer.php shows comanintained packages even on comaint=no) Jan 04
• Bug#406615: marked as done (PTS: Please do not use experimental changelog) Jan 24
• Bug#461497: marked as done (Mail maintainer when there is ubuntu patch) Jan 19
• Bug#356776: marked as done (PTS: lingering new upstream version todo) Jan 26
• Processed: severity of 381275 is wishlist, tagging 381275 Jan 24
• Processed: Re: Bug#356826: PTS: could e-mail when DEHS detects new upstream release Jan 23
• Processed: Re: Bug#381275: PTS: removed packages not considered when re-added to the archive Jan 24
• Bug#240829: marked as done (packages.qa.debian.org: better error handling (f.e. ENOSPC) to prevent good pages to be replaced with bogus ones) Jan 25

Eduardo Macan

• Re: RFS: zynaddsubfx Jan 08

Erwin

• Take your share..You must have it.. Jan 07
• Take your share..You must have it.. Jan 07

Filippo Giunchedi

• Bug#356826: PTS: could e-mail when DEHS detects new upstream release Jan 22
• Bug#462934: PTS -- Please redirect automatically for packages.qa.debian.org/<binary-package> Jan 29

Florian Weimer

• Bug#460983: PTS: Please link to Security Tracker Jan 16

Frank Lichtenheld

• Re: RFS: QA Uploads Jan 26
• Bug#462934: PTS -- Please redirect automatically for packages.qa.debian.org/<binary-package> Jan 28
• Re: RFS: QA Uploads Jan 26
• Re: RFS: QA Upload -- bazaar-docs Jan 28
• Re: RFS: Another QA Upload -- amavis-stats Jan 25
• Re: RFS: QA Uploads Jan 26
• Re: RFS: QA Uploads Jan 25
• Re: RFS: QA Uploads Jan 25
• Re: RFS: QA Uploads Jan 25
• Re: RFS: QA Upload - grokking-the-gimp Jan 25
• Re: RFS: QA Uploads Jan 25
• Re: RFS: QA Uploads Jan 25
• Re: RFS: QA Upload -- bazaar-docs Jan 29
• Re: RFS: Another QA Upload -- amavis-stats Jan 25

Frank S. Thomas

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02

Franklin PIAT

• Re: Bits from DEHS Jan 26

George B.

• "mia *at* qa.debian.org" bounces Jan 28

Guillem Jover

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 04
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02

Hamish Moffatt

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 03

Hubert Chathi

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02

Jack T Mudge III

• Re: remove xview? Jan 14
• Re: Removal candidate: bfr Jan 25

James Vega

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02

James Westby

• Removal candidate: bfr Jan 25

Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 05

Joe Nahmias

• Bug#460821: color wrong in watch column of xsel Jan 15

Joey Hess

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02

Justin Pryzby

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02

Kapil Hari Paranjape

• Bug#461000: packages.qa.debian.org: Status report bug list only links to one bug Jan 16

Kumar Appaiah

• Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled? Jan 09
• Bug#462934: PTS -- Please redirect automatically for packages.qa.debian.org/<binary-package> Jan 28

Kurt Roeckx

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02

Lars Wirzenius

• Re: New lintian pages available for testing Jan 03
• Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled? Jan 09
• Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled? Jan 09

Lucas Nussbaum

• Bug#461497: Mail maintainer when there is ubuntu patch Jan 19
• status of coreutils maintenance Jan 15
• Re: status of coreutils maintenance Jan 15
• Bug#356826: PTS: could e-mail when DEHS detects new upstream release Jan 22
• Bug#462934: PTS -- Please redirect automatically for packages.qa.debian.org/<binary-package> Jan 28
• Bug#356826: PTS: could e-mail when DEHS detects new upstream release Jan 22

Luk Claes

• Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled? Jan 09
• Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled? Jan 09
• Re: remove xview? Jan 15
• Re: remove xview? Jan 14
• Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled? Jan 09

Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 03

Marco Rodrigues

• Bug#461206: Feed XML doesn't 100% validate Jan 17
• Bug#461497: Mail maintainer when there is ubuntu patch Jan 19
• Bug#462627: About Uploaders field.. Jan 29
• Bug#461206: xmlparse... Jan 29

Martin Buck

• Re: remove xview? Jan 15

Martin Pitt

• Re: RFS: plr 1:8.2.0.7-3 Jan 19
• Building isdnutils with tcl8.4? Jan 04

Martin Zobel-Helas

• Bug#461891: qa.debian.org: DDPO testing migration excuses changes Jan 23

Martin-=C3=89ric?= Racine

• Bug#356826: PTS: could e-mail when DEHS detects new upstream release Jan 23

Michael Biebl

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02

Michael Koch

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 03

Mohammed Adnène Trojette

• Re: "mia *at* qa.debian.org" bounces Jan 28

Moritz Muehlenhoff

• Re: remove xview? Jan 15
• Bug#460983: PTS: Please link to Security Tracker Jan 15
• Re: status of coreutils maintenance Jan 15
• Bug#460983: PTS: Please link to Security Tracker Jan 16

onxlove-gpb...o3o1

• Unidentified subject! Jan 07

Paul Wise

• Re: remove xview? Jan 14
• Bug#373218: PTS: should replace dashes with underscores in lintian anchors Jan 02
• Re: RFS: alml 2005.01.01-3 Jan 20
• Bug#462627: PTS: don't show empty uploaders field Jan 26
• Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled? Jan 09
• Bug#463050: qa.debian.org: please list packages in mentors.d.n in TODO section Jan 29
• Bug#462470: PTS: don't show changelog-only ubuntu patches Jan 25
• Bug#463050: qa.debian.org: please list packages in mentors.d.n in TODO section Jan 29
• Bug#462627: PTS: don't show empty uploaders field Jan 26
• Bug#463050: qa.debian.org: please list packages in mentors.d.n in TODO section Jan 29
• Bug#461000: packages.qa.debian.org: Status report bug list only links to one bug Jan 17

Petter Reinholdtsen

• Bug#354307: packages.qa.debian.org/m/mydsn.html has weird sorted news Jan 13
• How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled? Jan 09
• Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled? Jan 09

Pierre Habouzit

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: RFS: pydict (Updated package) Jan 17
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02

Rafael Laboissiere

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 08

Raphael Geissert

• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 03
• List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 11
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Bug#356826: PTS: could e-mail when DEHS detects new upstream release Jan 23
• Bug#356826: PTS: could e-mail when DEHS detects new upstream release Jan 22
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 03
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 22
• Bug#460821: color wrong in watch column of xsel Jan 16
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 11
• Bug#463186: PTS: should not list the same architecture more than once Jan 30
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02

Raphael Hertzog

• Bug#460983: PTS: Please link to Security Tracker Jan 16
• Bug#354307: packages.qa.debian.org/m/mydsn.html has weird sorted news Jan 26
• Bug#356826: PTS: could e-mail when DEHS detects new upstream release Jan 23
• Re: Please take down junk QA pages Jan 01
• Bug#461000: packages.qa.debian.org: Status report bug list only links to one bug Jan 16
• Bug#354307: packages.qa.debian.org/m/mydsn.html has weird sorted news Jan 26
• Bug#460983: PTS: Please link to Security Tracker Jan 16
• Bug#461891: qa.debian.org: DDPO testing migration excuses changes Jan 23
• Bug#457759: PTS: bug summary counts bugs that are assigned to two or more packages more than once Jan 26
• Bug#462470: PTS: don't show changelog-only ubuntu patches Jan 25
• Bug#356826: PTS: could e-mail when DEHS detects new upstream release Jan 22
• Bug#354307: packages.qa.debian.org/m/mydsn.html has weird sorted news Jan 27
• Re: empty Packages.qa.debian.org pages gone Jan 25

Riku Voipio

• Re: remove xview? Jan 15
• Re: remove xview? Jan 14
• remove xview? Jan 14

Robert Vogel

• Re: RFS: zynaddsubfx Jan 09

Roberto C . Sánchez

• Bug#463186: PTS: should not list the same architecture more than once Jan 30

Russ Allbery

• Re: New lintian pages available for testing Jan 03
• Re: New lintian pages available for testing Jan 03
• New lintian pages available for testing Jan 03
• Re: New lintian pages available for testing Jan 03
• Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all Jan 02
• Bug#373218: PTS: should replace dashes with underscores in lintian anchors Jan 02

Seo Sanghyeon

• Re: simpleparse Jan 26

Stefano Zacchiroli

• Bug#354307: packages.qa.debian.org/m/mydsn.html has weird sorted news Jan 27
• Bug#463050: qa.debian.org: please list packages in mentors.d.n in TODO section Jan 29
• Bug#462627: PTS: don't show empty uploaders field Jan 26
• Re: New lintian pages available for testing Jan 03
• Bug#354307: packages.qa.debian.org/m/mydsn.html has weird sorted news Jan 26
• Bug#354307: packages.qa.debian.org/m/mydsn.html has weird sorted news Jan 25
• Bug#354307: packages.qa.debian.org/m/mydsn.html has weird sorted news Jan 25
• Re: empty Packages.qa.debian.org pages gone Jan 25
• Bug#354307: packages.qa.debian.org/m/mydsn.html has weird sorted news Jan 26
• Bug#381275: PTS: removed packages not considered when re-added to the archive Jan 24
• Bug#457759: PTS: bug summary counts bugs that are assigned to two or more packages more than once Jan 26
• Bug#458329: [rra@debian.org: Re: Bug#458329: PTS: don't show lintian link when there are no lintian warnings] Jan 01
• Bug#460983: PTS: Please link to Security Tracker Jan 16
• Bug#354307: packages.qa.debian.org/m/mydsn.html has weird sorted news Jan 25

Steve Langasek

• Re: remove xview? Jan 15
• Re: Oldlibs transitions, and some old packages. (wx2.4) Jan 12
• Re: remove xview? Jan 17
• Re: Removal candidate: bfr Jan 25
• Re: Oldlibs transitions, and some old packages. Jan 04

Thijs Kinkhorst

• Re: New lintian pages available for testing Jan 03
• Re: New lintian pages available for testing Jan 03

Thomas Huriaux

• Re: Please take down junk QA pages Jan 01

Thomas Viehmann

• Re: RFS: alml 2005.01.01-3 Jan 20
• Re: RFS: alml 2005.01.01-3 Jan 20
• Re: RFS: plr 1:8.2.0.7-3 Jan 19
• Re: Please take down junk QA pages Jan 01
• Re: RFS: alml 2005.01.01-3 Jan 20

tim hall

• Re: remove xview? Jan 15
• Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled? Jan 09
• Re: New lintian pages available for testing Jan 03
• Re: RFS: zynaddsubfx Jan 08
• Re: New lintian pages available for testing Jan 04
• Re: remove xview? Jan 15
• Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled? Jan 09
• Re: remove xview? Jan 15
• Re: New lintian pages available for testing Jan 03

Varun Hiremath

• Bug#457546: New debian image with swirl for PTS page Jan 12

Vincent Bernat

• Re: simpleparse Jan 26
• simpleparse Jan 25

Volker Ossenkopf

• Re: remove xview? Jan 14

Y Giridhar Appaji Nag

• Bug#459012: qa.debian.org: DEHS should check for validity of Homepage: and Vcs-Browser: Jan 04
• Bug#463050: qa.debian.org: please list packages in mentors.d.n in TODO section Jan 30

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]