[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#433933: marked as done (should not complain about ITPs of packages which are only in experimental)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:46:36 +0100
with message-id <20080126164636.GA25185@takhisis.invalid>
and subject line should not complain about ITPs of packages which are only in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor

PTS says the following about ekg2 (which is still only in experimental
ATM):

The WNPP database contains an ITP (Intent To Package) entry for this
package. This is probably an error, as it has already been packaged.
Please see bug number  #267277 for more information.

I think there was a consensus, that one should not close an ITP bug
until the package makes it at least into unstable.

So the above is not necessarily a problem in this case.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686-mactel
Locale: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:10:05 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> I think there was a consensus, that one should not close an ITP bug
> until the package makes it at least into unstable.

Comments to this bug report show that there is no such consensus (FWIW,
I agree for one more, to the two comments reported on this). Concluding
from it that this is not a bug, I'm closing this bug report.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{upsilon.cc,cs.unibo.it,debian.org}  -<%>-  http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: