Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

To: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
From: Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:41:07 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080103104107.GP14146@quadriga.konqueror.de>
Mail-followup-to: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-qa@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] flgo05$l3r$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] flgo05$l3r$1@ger.gmane.org>

Hello,


On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:17:24PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de>
>    antlr (U)

False positive. libantlr-dev includes two static libraries and may not
be arch:any therefor.


Cheers,
Michael

Reply to:

References:
- List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: New lintian pages available for testing
Next by Date: Re: New lintian pages available for testing
Previous by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Next by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread