[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#367098: marked as done (PTS: bug summary should not count merged bugs twice)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:40:10 +0100
with message-id <20080126164010.GA24915@takhisis.invalid>
and subject line invalid, would induce a different meaning of "summary" than bts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor

Hello all,

The PTS shows a summary of the bug numbers for a package, however if a
package has two bugs which are merged, it displays 2. I'd expect 1 to be
a better summary of the state of affairs.

regards,
Thijs

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
> The PTS shows a summary of the bug numbers for a package, however if a
> package has two bugs which are merged, it displays 2. I'd expect 1 to be
> a better summary of the state of affairs.

Not a bug. The BTS bug log pages count in summary lines merged bug
twice, we should the PTS behave differently?

Closing the bug on the basis of this observation. If you really want to
see this changed, you really should convince first the bugs.d.o
maintainer to change the meaning of bug count there ...

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{upsilon.cc,cs.unibo.it,debian.org}  -<%>-  http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: