Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

To: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:12:26 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] flgr7b$uqm$3@ger.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] flgo05$l3r$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] flgqde$uqm$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20080102200444.GB4997@artemis.madism.org>

Pierre Habouzit wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:58:24PM +0000, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
>>    libgss-dbg (U)
>>    shishi-dbg (U)
> 
> rriiiight...
> 

-dbg package without a Depends? that sounds like a bug (please read my first
message).

Depends: sishi
Depends: libgss0
?

-- 
Atomo64 - Raphael

Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Reply to:

References:
- List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Next by Date: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Previous by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Next by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread