debian-legal Nov 2002 by thread

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Re: Berkeley DB curious licensing practice Bennett Todd

Re: Berkeley DB curious licensing practice Mark Brown

Re: [dev] Re: LZW patented file left in .orig.tar source package? Nick Phillips
Making things non-free again (was: ldp-es_20002103-7_i386.changes REJECTED) Thomas Uwe Gruettmueller
Re: ldp-es_20002103-7_i386.changes REJECTED Henning Makholm

off-topic discussion about permissions and promises Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS

Re: off-topic discussion about permissions and promises Henning Makholm

Re: off-topic discussion about permissions and promises Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: off-topic discussion about permissions and promises Branden Robinson
Re: off-topic discussion about permissions and promises Henning Makholm

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: ldp-es_20002103-7_i386.changes REJECTED Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Re: ldp-es_20002103-7_i386.changes REJECTED Henning Makholm

Re: ldp-es_20002103-7_i386.changes REJECTED Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Re: ldp-es_20002103-7_i386.changes REJECTED Branden Robinson

Re: ldp-es_20002103-7_i386.changes REJECTED Osamu Aoki

Re: ldp-es_20002103-7_i386.changes REJECTED Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña

Re: ldp-es_20002103-7_i386.changes REJECTED Henning Makholm
Re: ldp-es_20002103-7_i386.changes REJECTED Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
Re: ldp-es_20002103-7_i386.changes REJECTED Henning Makholm

Re: click-through EULA vs DFSG Nick Phillips

Re: click-through EULA vs DFSG Glenn Maynard

Re: click-through EULA vs DFSG Nick Phillips

cupsys + libssl + libgnutls = confusion. Andrew Lau

Re: cupsys + libssl + libgnutls = confusion. Adrian Bunk
Re: cupsys + libssl + libgnutls = confusion. Jeff Licquia

Re: New EULA of UnrealIRCd Jeff Licquia

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: New EULA of UnrealIRCd Wookey

Re: New EULA of UnrealIRCd David Starner

Aspell-en license Once again. Kevin Atkinson

Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Brian Nelson
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Branden Robinson

Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Henning Makholm

Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Brian Nelson
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. David Starner
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Brian Nelson
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. David Starner
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Henning Makholm
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Henning Makholm
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Brian Nelson
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Kevin Atkinson
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Brian Nelson
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Henning Makholm
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Kevin Atkinson
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Brian Nelson
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Kevin Atkinson
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Brian Nelson
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Henning Makholm
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Kevin Atkinson
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Henning Makholm
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Jeff Licquia
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Jeff Licquia
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Henning Makholm
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Branden Robinson
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Walter Landry
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Kevin Atkinson
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Derek Gladding
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Joe Moore
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. David Turner
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Derek Gladding
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. David Turner
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Richard Stallman
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Henning Makholm
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Florian Weimer
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Walter Landry
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Brian Nelson
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Peter Palfrader
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Brian Nelson
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Walter Landry
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Brian Nelson
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Walter Landry
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Henning Makholm
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Jeff Licquia
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Branden Robinson
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Henning Makholm
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. David Starner
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Henning Makholm
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. David Starner
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Branden Robinson

Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Kevin Atkinson

Re: Aspell-en license Once again. Branden Robinson

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Aspell-en license Once again. starner

debian cd-image mirrors and US export restrictions nighty
License question Michael Meskes

Re: License question Henning Makholm

Re: License question Michael Meskes

Apple Public Source License and more Jens Schmalzing

Re: Apple Public Source License and more Steve Langasek

Out of Office AutoReply: W32.Klez.E removal tools fanmas
Aspell-en's questionable license Brian Nelson

Re: Aspell-en's questionable license David Turner

Re: Aspell-en's questionable license Richard Stallman

Re: Bug#167747: proftpd-mysql: links against OpenSSL and GPL licensed libmysqlclient10 Andreas Metzler

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Bug#167747: proftpd-mysql: links against OpenSSL and GPL licensed libmysqlclient10 Andreas Metzler

Re: Bug#167747: proftpd-mysql: links against OpenSSL and GPL licensed libmysqlclient10 Andreas Metzler

Re: Bug#167747: proftpd-mysql: links against OpenSSL and GPL licensed libmysqlclient10 Jeff Licquia

kernel driver module with proprietary closed source piece. Sven Luther

Re: kernel driver module with proprietary closed source piece. Henning Makholm

Re: kernel driver module with proprietary closed source piece. Sven Luther

Re: kernel driver module with proprietary closed source piece. Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: kernel driver module with proprietary closed source piece. Sven Luther
Re: kernel driver module with proprietary closed source piece. Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: kernel driver module with proprietary closed source piece. Sven Luther
Re: kernel driver module with proprietary closed source piece. Sven Luther

Re: kernel driver module with proprietary closed source piece. Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS

Re: kernel driver module with proprietary closed source piece. Sven Luther

European Directive on the legal protection of databases Jacobo Tarrio

Re: European Directive on the legal protection of databases Walter Landry

DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Andrea Borgia

Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Santiago Vila

Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Andrea Borgia

Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Andrea Borgia
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Andrea Borgia
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Andrea Borgia
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Santiago Vila
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Andrea Borgia
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Santiago Vila
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Andrea Borgia
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Santiago Vila
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Andrea Borgia
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Branden Robinson
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Branden Robinson
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Nathan E Norman
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Branden Robinson
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Branden Robinson
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? David Turner
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Henning Makholm
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? David Turner
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Pine's legal notices; free Pine alternatives? Steve Langasek
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Branden Robinson
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Steve Langasek

Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Andrea Borgia

Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Peter Palfrader
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Bernhard R. Link
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Joey Hess
Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha? Thomas Bushnell, BSG

question about leaving lzw and unknown-license code in source Roland Marcus Rutschmann

Re: question about leaving lzw and unknown-license code in source Bas Zoetekouw

Re: question about leaving lzw and unknown-license code in source Anthony DeRobertis

Re: question about leaving lzw and unknown-license code in source Terry Hancock
Re: question about leaving lzw and unknown-license code in source Branden Robinson
Re: question about leaving lzw and unknown-license code in source Florian Weimer

Re: question about leaving lzw and unknown-license code in source Andreas Tille

Re: question about leaving lzw and unknown-license code in source Walter Landry
Re: question about leaving lzw and unknown-license code in source Branden Robinson

YAST License, is redistribution permitted? Marcelo E. Magallon

Re: YAST License, is redistribution permitted? Thomas Uwe Gruettmueller

Re: YAST License, is redistribution permitted? Branden Robinson

OT: Re: YAST License, is redistribution permitted? Thomas Uwe Gruettmueller

final licence question. Sven Luther

Re: final licence question. Steve Langasek

Re: final licence question. Sven Luther

Re: final licence question. Steve Langasek
Re: final licence question. Sven Luther
Re: final licence question. Steve Langasek
Re: final licence question. Sven Luther
Re: final licence question. Steve Langasek
Re: final licence question. Sven Luther
Re: final licence question. Steve Langasek
Re: final licence question. Sven Luther

Re: Bug#168589: ITP: xfuse - a ZX Spectrum and TC2048 emulator Colin Watson

Re: Bug#168589: ITP: xfuse - a ZX Spectrum and TC2048 emulator Branden Robinson
Re: Bug#168589: ITP: xfuse - a ZX Spectrum and TC2048 emulator Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS

Re: Bug#168589: ITP: xfuse - a ZX Spectrum and TC2048 emulator Colin Watson

Re: Bug#168589: ITP: xfuse - a ZX Spectrum and TC2048 emulator Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS

Re: Bug#168589: ITP: xfuse - a ZX Spectrum and TC2048 emulator David Given

LZW patent runs out in the US at 20.12.2002? Drew Scott Daniels
Re: Bug#158320: ITP: cl-defsystem3 -- A system definition and building package for Common Lisp programs Kevin Rosenberg

Re: Bug#158320: ITP: cl-defsystem3 -- A system definition and building package for Common Lisp programs Walter Landry

Re: Bug#158320: ITP: cl-defsystem3 -- A system definition and building package for Common Lisp programs Kevin Rosenberg

Re: Bug#158320: ITP: cl-defsystem3 -- A system definition and building package for Common Lisp programs Branden Robinson

Re: Bug#158320: ITP: cl-defsystem3 -- A system definition and building package for Common Lisp programs Kevin Rosenberg

Re: Bug#158320: ITP: cl-defsystem3 -- A system definition and building package for Common Lisp programs Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Re: Bug#158320: ITP: cl-defsystem3 -- A system definition and building package for Common Lisp programs Branden Robinson

Re: Bug#158320: ITP: cl-defsystem3 -- A system definition and building package for Common Lisp programs Kevin Rosenberg

Please review license change for cl-defsystem3 Kevin Rosenberg

Re: Please review license change for cl-defsystem3 Branden Robinson

Re: Please review license change for cl-defsystem3 Marco Antoniotti
Re: Please review license change for cl-defsystem3 Kevin Rosenberg
Copying/modification/distribution/sale combos and setting terms on use J.B. Nicholson-Owens
Re: Copying/modification/distribution/sale combos and setting terms on use Glenn Maynard
Re: Copying/modification/distribution/sale combos and setting terms on use ninewands
Re: Copying/modification/distribution/sale combos and setting terms on use Kevin Rosenberg

Re: Bug#169243: ilisp: Is it even distributable? Kevin Rosenberg

Re: [Ilisp-devel] Re: Bug#169243: ilisp: Is it even distributable? Kevin Rosenberg

Re: [Ilisp-devel] Re: Bug#169243: ilisp: Is it even distributable? Peter S Galbraith

Re: Bug#169243: ilisp: Is it even distributable? Peter S Galbraith

Re: Bug#169243: ilisp: Is it even distributable? Kevin Rosenberg
Re: [Ilisp-devel] Re: Bug#169243: ilisp: Is it even distributable? Marco Antoniotti

Re: [Ilisp-devel] Re: Bug#169243: ilisp: Is it even distributable? Larry Hunter

Re: [Ilisp-devel] Re: Bug#169243: ilisp: Is it even distributable? Branden Robinson

Re: [Ilisp-devel] Re: Bug#169243: ilisp: Is it even distributable? Kevin Rosenberg

the Lisp Lesser General Public License Branden Robinson

Re: the Lisp Lesser General Public License Walter Landry
Re: the Lisp Lesser General Public License Kevin Rosenberg

Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.0 - Q.10 Giacomo Catenazzi

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.0 - Q.10 Henning Makholm

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.0 - Q.10 David Turner
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.0 - Q.10 Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.0 - Q.10 Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.0 - Q.10 Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.0 - Q.10 Branden Robinson
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.0 - Q.10 Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
OT: history of "copyright" (was: Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.0 - Q.10) Derek Gladding
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.0 - Q.10 Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.0 - Q.10 John Galt
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.0 - Q.10 Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.0 - Q.10 Derek Gladding
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.0 - Q.10 Branden Robinson
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.0 - Q.10 Henning Makholm
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.0 - Q.10 Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.11 Giacomo Catenazzi

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.11 Florian Weimer
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.11 Henning Makholm

Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.12 Giacomo Catenazzi

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.12 Henning Makholm

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.12 David Turner

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.12 Jakob Bohm
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.12 David Turner
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.12 Jakob Bohm
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.12 David Turner

Re: Java licensing (was Re: Discussion - non-free software removal) Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña

Re: Java licensing Walter Landry

Please Confirm Your $10,000 Entries! contest
Following up - please reply to confirm! [debian-legal@lists.debian.org/1831] Recommend-It Confirmation Bot
Re: Is Emacs a GPL'ed library wrt elisp code? Peter S Galbraith

Re: Is Emacs a GPL'ed library wrt elisp code? Richard Stallman

Are c code from www.ioccc.org free? Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis

Re: Are c code from www.ioccc.org free? Jacobo Tarrio
Re: Are c code from www.ioccc.org free? Branden Robinson
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Re: Are c code from www.ioccc.org free? ninewands

ms windows O.B.Gilmour
Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.13 Giacomo Catenazzi

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.13 Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.13 Henning Makholm

Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.14 Giacomo Catenazzi

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.14 ninewands
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.14 Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.14 Henning Makholm

Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.15 Giacomo Catenazzi

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.15 ninewands

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.15 Giacomo Catenazzi

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.15 Giacomo Catenazzi

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.15 Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.15 Henning Makholm
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.15 J.B. Nicholson-Owens

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.15 Chris Lawrence

Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.16 Giacomo Catenazzi

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.16 Thomas Bushnell, BSG
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.16 Nathanael Nerode

Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.17 Giacomo Catenazzi

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.17 Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.18 Giacomo Catenazzi

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.18 Zephaniah E. Hull

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.18 Steve Langasek

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.18 Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Re: Freeradius and Debian Chad Miller

Re: Freeradius and Debian Steve Langasek

Re: Freeradius and Debian Sam Hartman

Re: Freeradius and Debian Steve Langasek
Re: Freeradius and Debian ninewands
Re: Freeradius and Debian Wichert Akkerman
Re: Freeradius and Debian Walter Landry
Re: Freeradius and Debian Steve Langasek
Re: Freeradius and Debian Walter Landry

#153467: libjpeg62: JPEG is patent-encumbered Bill Allombert

Re: #153467: libjpeg62: JPEG is patent-encumbered Richard Braakman

Hardware license Rich Walker

Re: Hardware license Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Re: Hardware license Rich Walker

Re: Hardware license Walter Landry
Re: Hardware license Rich Walker

Re: Hardware license Terry Hancock

Re: Hardware license Rich Walker

FSF has published GNU FDL version 1.2 Branden Robinson

Re: FSF has published GNU FDL version 1.2 Walter Landry

Re: FSF has published GNU FDL version 1.2 Branden Robinson

Re: FSF has published GNU FDL version 1.2 Henning Makholm

Re: location of UnicodeData.txt Branden Robinson

Message not available
- Re: location of UnicodeData.txt Branden Robinson
Message not available
- Message not available
  - Re: location of UnicodeData.txt Branden Robinson
  - Re: location of UnicodeData.txt Sam Hartman
Re: location of UnicodeData.txt Richard Braakman
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: location of UnicodeData.txt starner

Re: location of UnicodeData.txt Branden Robinson
Re: location of UnicodeData.txt Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS

Re: location of UnicodeData.txt Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Apache License & LGPL Compatible TJ Mather

Re: Apache License & LGPL Compatible ninewands

Re: Apache License & LGPL Compatible TJ Mather

Non-EU? (Was Re: Aspell-en license Once again.) Nathanael Nerode

Re: Non-EU? Brian Nelson

Re: Non-EU? Terry Hancock

Message not available
- Re: Non-EU? (Was Re: Aspell-en license Once again.) Nathanael Nerode

The last update was on 06:23 GMT Sat Jun 29. There are 304 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc