Re: ldp-es_20002103-7_i386.changes REJECTED
- To: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Cc: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS <edmundo@rano.org>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: ldp-es_20002103-7_i386.changes REJECTED
- From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
- Date: 02 Nov 2002 17:34:19 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] yahy98cylpw.fsf@ask.diku.dk>
- In-reply-to: tb@becket.net's message of "01 Nov 2002 10:55:21 -0800"
- References: <20021029143150.GA8726@dat.etsit.upm.es> <20021029181154.GZ17459@deadbeast.net> <20021029195609.GA27424@dat.etsit.upm.es> <20021029212128.GF4866@netexpress.net> <20021030083858.GA15758@dat.etsit.upm.es> <20021030203804.GF15025@netexpress.net> <20021031081231.GB3299@dat.etsit.upm.es> <20021031172932.GA5424@dvdeug> <yahwunycwoo.fsf@pc-043.diku.dk> <20021031185407.GA832@rano.org> <20021031201508.GD5526@netexpress.net> <[🔎] 87hef1glwm.fsf@becket.becket.net>
Scripsit tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
> It is a grant of permission, which is, in fact, legally called a
> "license".
> It isn't an "agreement between civil parties",
In these parts of the world (Denmark), the legal treatment of such
"grants" follow exactly the same rules as for other kinds of
"promises" (which includes the bilateral tit-for-tat promises we call
"agreements").
I concede that the legal systematic may work differently in common-law
countries.
--
Henning Makholm "Slip den panserraket og læg
dig på jorden med ansigtet nedad!"
Reply to: