Re: DFSG vs Pine's legal notices: where exactly is the gotcha?
Branden Robinson <email@example.com> writes:
> I think I was being reminded of the MIT/X11 license instead:
> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
> copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
> "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including
> without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish,
> distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to
> permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to
> the following conditions:
> Well, Thomas? How about this one? Is being able to "deal" in the work
> "without restriction" and "without limitation" sufficient to allow
> people to distribute modified copies?
My suggestion is that you ask the FSF for their more detailed advice.