Re: Hardware license
Terry Hancock <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Tuesday 26 November 2002 01:59 pm, Rich Walker wrote:
> > We've been putting together some robot-related software and hardware. We
> > want to release this with a DFSG-compliant license set. For the
> > software, GPL, no problems. For the hardware we propose to include .pcb
> > files for pcb, .sch files for gschem, and .asm files for the PIC
> > firmware. What licenses are appropriate for hardware releases?
> The LART license is probably required reading on this subject ;-)
Yes; I'm currently looking at that and the OpenIPCore license.
Are these both compliant licenses?
> and you'll probably want to look at the site in general
> for other information about an apparently successful open
> hardware project.
cheers for that,
rich walker | technical person | Shadow Robot Company | email@example.com
front-of-tshirt space to let 251 Liverpool Road |
London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487