debian-legal Oct 2006 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
3-clause BSD with additional disclaimers Message refusé: Virus / Mail rejected: Virus [cascardo@minaslivre.org: Re: Bug#395961: gabber: Links with GPL-incompatible licensed OpenSSL] Re: [Fwd: Re: Problem with license of msv-xsdlib] Are source packages required to be DFSG-free? (was: Re: New bugs filed regarding non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds) Re: Bug#383481: Must source code be easy to understand to fall under DFSG? Re: Bug#395961: gabber: Links with GPL-incompatible licensed OpenSSL Re: Bug#395961: gabber: Links with GPL-incompatible licensed OpenSSL Re: CC's responses to v3draft comments compatibility of bsd and gpl conquer relicensing Re: Creative Commons 3.0 Public draft -- news and questions Dated Notice font presents in http://www.webpagepublicity.com Re: Freeness of a license - french Freeness of current draft of GNU SFDLv1 Help with bug #285156 - Non free translation humanist FWD: in refrence to debian-laptop-request promptly Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ? kqemu license isue Re: libbtctl: two questions regarding use of LGPL and GPL in source files Re: Licence for a file in tstat: is it compatible with Debian? License review request Re: License review request: LinuxMagic FSCL main or contrib? Re: math package maintainer for Debian Must source code be easy to understand to fall under DFSG? New bugs filed regarding non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds New draft of GFDL and GSFDL No work tomorrow; Office closed Re: Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages (was: Re: Are source packages required to be DFSG-free?) non-free license review + question for ftp-master Re: Object Management Group redistributable files Offices have been closed permanently OSSAL/CC license of xMule parts Owner will be laid off Re: Problem with license of msv-xsdlib Public discussion time for Creative Commons 3.0 license draft coming to a close Re: Public discussion time for Creative Commons 3.0 license draft coming to a close Re: public domain, take ∞ Re: public domain, take ?$B!g Releasing a software implementation of a board game as Free Software RPO Re: Vicam driver appears to contain misappropriated code Re: Why not use a "patended" section for programs with patent problems? Why not use a non-us section for program with patent problems in US? Why TPM+Parallel Distribution is non-free Re: Yahoo! DomainKeys license The last update was on 05:58 GMT Fri Jun 28. There are 232 messages. Page 1 of 1.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc