On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 03:35:26PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 03:49:25PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > > The answer to the question in the subject is simple: NO. > > > > Thankyou for your opinion. I note you seemed to neglect to mention > > that you're not a lawyer. > > That should be abundantly apparent to anyone who has been paying > attention. Regardless, it doesn't dismiss the crux of the argument: > baring competent legal advice to the contrary,[1] distributing > sourceless GPLed works is not clear of legal liability. Doing > otherwise may put ourselves and our mirror operators in peril. > So what? Distributing GPL works *with* sources is also not clear of legal liability. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature