Re: main or contrib?
mdpoole@troilus.org wrote:
>As far as I can tell, [1] is the only thread that predates -legal and
>touches on this issue. As far as it comes to a conclusion, it is that
This was not the thread.
>bits that depend on non-main packages must go into contrib or
>non-free. This is consistent with the much more recent work to move
>firmware-loading kernel drivers out of main. Are IM client programs
>exempt from this, or should bugs be filed with appropriate severity?
The IM clients in main do not depend on non-main packages.
--
ciao,
Marco
Reply to: