[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: CC's responses to v3draft comments

On 9/27/06, MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop> wrote:
> Since the CC licenses don't require distribution of the preferred
> form for making modification aka. source code, it is essential that
> downstream recipient can extract works for modification and
> redistribution without violating any law that protects TPM. I think
> that it makes sense for CC licenses to have anti-TPM language and I
> don't think that anti-TPM language should make a license non-free.

Should we accept as free software a program under a licence which does
not allow licensees to distribute compiled files?

The correct way to fix this is for CC to require source code, not
prohibit compiled code.

I don't understand this. How CC probihits compiled code?

Markus Laire

Reply to: