Re: Why TPM+Parallel Distribution is non-free
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:42, Don Armstrong wrote:
> >>>If you're seriously interested in discussing how to do copylefted
> >>>TPM and DRM properly, I strongly suggest reading my position
> >>>statement from committee D on the first discussion draft of the
> >>URL please?
> I don't see anything in that position statement that would indicate a
> flaw in CC's 3.0 draft wording. Is there something specific that I
That position statement is basically an introduction to a set of the
problems of dealing properly with TPM/DRM; it was written before CC
3.0 was published, but the issues haven't changed. [The other parts
are in the meeting notes with Seth Schoen.]
"There's no problem so large it can't be solved by killing the user
off, deleting their files, closing their account and reporting their
REAL earnings to the IRS."
-- The B.O.F.H..