debian-legal Apr 2006 by thread

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Re: Mozilla relicensing complete Mike Hommey

Re: Mozilla relicensing complete Francesco Poli

Re: Mozilla relicensing complete Mike Hommey
Re: Mozilla relicensing complete Gervase Markham

Re: Mozilla relicensing complete Mike Hommey
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Mozilla relicensing complete Henning Makholm
Re: Mozilla relicensing complete Lionel Elie Mamane

Re: RFC: the new license for IBPP Damyan Ivanov

Re: RFC: the new license for IBPP Francesco Poli

Re: RFC: the new license for IBPP Damyan Ivanov

Re: RFC: the new license for IBPP MJ Ray

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: RFC: the new license for IBPP Damyan Ivanov

Re: Format of the copyright file Frank Küster

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Format of the copyright file Raul Miller

Re: MPL license Marco d'Itri

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: MPL license Andrew Saunders
Re: MPL license Mike Hommey

Re: MPL license Anthony DeRobertis

MPL and Source Code Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo

<Possible follow-ups>
MPL and Source Code Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo

Re: MPL and Source Code Craig Southeren

Re: MPL and Source Code Michael Poole
Re: MPL and Source Code Marco d'Itri
Re: MPL and Source Code Craig Southeren
Re: MPL and Source Code Steve Langasek
Re: MPL and Source Code MJ Ray
Re: MPL and Source Code Anthony DeRobertis
Re: MPL and Source Code Josh Triplett
Re: MPL and Source Code Craig Southeren
Re: MPL and Source Code Jacobo Tarrio
Re: MPL and Source Code Henning Makholm
Re: MPL and Source Code Craig Southeren
Re: MPL and Source Code Frank Küster
Re: MPL and Source Code Anthony DeRobertis
Re: MPL and Source Code Craig Southeren
Re: MPL and Source Code Steve Langasek
Re: MPL and Source Code Craig Southeren
Re: MPL and Source Code Michael Poole
Re: MPL and Source Code Craig Southeren
Re: MPL and Source Code Craig Southeren
Re: MPL and Source Code Matthew Palmer
Re: MPL and Source Code Anthony DeRobertis
Re: MPL and Source Code Craig Southeren
Re: MPL and Source Code Josh Triplett
Re: MPL and Source Code Craig Southeren
Re: MPL and Source Code Tzafrir Cohen
Re: MPL and Source Code Craig Southeren
Re: MPL and Source Code Frank Küster
Re: MPL and Source Code Josh Triplett
Re: MPL and Source Code Matthew Palmer
Re: MPL and Source Code Matthew Palmer
Re: MPL and Source Code Anthony DeRobertis
Re: MPL and Source Code Craig Southeren
Re: MPL and Source Code Matthew Palmer

new tool - searching for example Csillag Kristóf

Re: new tool - searching for example Anthony DeRobertis

Re: new tool - searching for example Csillag Kristóf

Re: new tool - searching for example Francesco Poli

Re: new tool - searching for example Anthony DeRobertis

Re: new tool - searching for example Frank Küster

Re: GFDL'ed documents with Front Cover text Steve M. Robbins
O arquivo que você enviou está infectado por vírus SrvDomino02
license of schema files Noèl Köthe

Re: license of schema files Måns Rullgård

Re: license of schema files Steve Langasek

Re: license of schema files MJ Ray

Re: license of schema files Simon Josefsson

Re: [pkg-kolab] license of schema files Peter Eisentraut

Re: [pkg-kolab] license of schema files Simon Josefsson

Re: Problematic distribution of P2P clients in France Florian Weimer

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Problematic distribution of P2P clients in France Michelle Konzack
Re: Problematic distribution of P2P clients in France Michelle Konzack

export to embargo countries Frank Lenaerts

Re: export to embargo countries olive

Re: export to embargo countries olive
Re: export to embargo countries Frank Lenaerts

Re: export to embargo countries Ryan R. Matt
Re: export to embargo countries olive
Re: export to embargo countries Frank Lenaerts
Re: export to embargo countries Don Armstrong

Re: export to embargo countries Henning Makholm

cold Ltd Duncan Rmtfdc
Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture Andrew Donnellan

Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture Andrew Donnellan

Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture Martin Wuertele

Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture Andrew Donnellan
Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture Martin Wuertele
Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture Aurelien Jarno

Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture Alex Ross

Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture Steve Langasek

Re: dpkg support for solaris-i386 architecture Russ Allbery

Re: clarification of doc licensing for db3/db4.2 dann frazier

Bug#256332: clarification of doc licensing for db3/db4.2 MJ Ray

Re: Bug#256332: clarification of doc licensing for db3/db4.2 dann frazier

Re: Bug#256332: clarification of doc licensing for db3/db4.2 MJ Ray
Re: Bug#256332: clarification of doc licensing for db3/db4.2 dann frazier

RE: clarification of doc licensing for db3/db4.2 Mike Olson

Re: clarification of doc licensing for db3/db4.2 Andrew Donnellan

Re: clarification of doc licensing for db3/db4.2 dann frazier
Re: clarification of doc licensing for db3/db4.2 dann frazier

cube-data package Gonéri Le Bouder

Re: cube-data package Francesco Poli
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: cube-data package Gonéri Le Bouder

Re: cube-data package Josh Triplett

Re: cube-data package Francesco Poli
Re: cube-data package Gonéri Le Bouder
Re: cube-data package Francesco Poli
Re: cube-data package Eddy Petrişor
Re: cube-data package Francesco Poli

Against DRM 1.0 Max Brown

Re: Against DRM 1.0 Henning Makholm

Re: Against DRM 1.0 Max Brown

Re: Against DRM 1.0 Lewis Jardine
Re: Against DRM 1.0 Max Brown
Re: Against DRM 1.0 Lewis Jardine
Message not available
Re: Against DRM 1.0 Lewis Jardine
Re: Against DRM 1.0 Max Brown

Re: Re: proposed licence change for moodle Peter
INHERITANCE samuel mbamba
kscope licences Fathi Boudra

Re: kscope licences MJ Ray

Re: kscope licences Fathi Boudra

Re: kscope licences MJ Ray
Re: kscope licences Ben
Re: kscope licences MJ Ray

[Fwd: Re: avidemux in Debian] Cyrille Bollu
PHP license... Pierre Habouzit

Re: PHP license... Francesco Poli

Re: PHP license... Pierre Habouzit

Re: PHP license... Francesco Poli

Re: PHP license... Charles Fry

Re: PHP license... Francesco Poli

infos about alien licenses Wolfgang Lonien

Re: infos about alien licenses Matthew Palmer

Re: infos about alien licenses Wolfgang Lonien

Re: infos about alien licenses Matthew Palmer
Re: infos about alien licenses Wolfgang Lonien
Re: infos about alien licenses Matthew Palmer

Re: infos about alien licenses Stephen Gran

Re: infos about alien licenses Matthew Palmer
Re: infos about alien licenses Stephen Gran
Re: infos about alien licenses Wolfgang Lonien
Re: infos about alien licenses Frank Küster
Re: infos about alien licenses Stephen Gran

Re: infos about alien licenses Henning Makholm

Apache license 1.1 for non-Apache software Gregory Colpart

Re: Apache license 1.1 for non-Apache software MJ Ray

Re: Apache license 1.1 for non-Apache software Francesco Poli

Re: Apache license 1.1 for non-Apache software Andrew Donnellan
Re: Apache license 1.1 for non-Apache software Gregory Colpart
Re: Apache license 1.1 for non-Apache software Francesco Poli
Re: Apache license 1.1 for non-Apache software Francesco Poli

Void license problem Nacho Barrientos Arias

Re: Void license problem Stephen Gran

Re: Void license problem Nacho Barrientos Arias

MySQL licensing issues again :) This time with yaSSL. Christian Hammers

Re: MySQL licensing issues again :) This time with yaSSL. Steve Langasek

Re: MySQL licensing issues again :) This time with yaSSL. Florian Weimer

Re: MySQL licensing issues again :) This time with yaSSL. Steve Langasek

[FW: Proposal: Remove GPL boilerplate at the top of every G2 file] Michael Schultheiss

Re: [FW: Proposal: Remove GPL boilerplate at the top of every G2 file] MJ Ray

Implicit granting of rights? (was: Bug#363061: tetex-extra: palatcm.sty is non-free) Frank Küster

Re: Implicit granting of rights? Josh Triplett

Re: Bug#363061: Implicit granting of rights? Frank Küster

Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license status Adriaan Peeters

Re: Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license status MJ Ray

What does "disclaiming a copyright mean"? Charles Plessy

Re: What does "disclaiming a copyright mean"? Andrew Donnellan

Re: What does "disclaiming a copyright mean"? Seth David Schoen

Re: What does "disclaiming a copyright mean"? Andrew Donnellan
Re: What does "disclaiming a copyright mean"? Seth David Schoen

Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña

Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Manoj Srivastava

Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Francesco Poli

Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña

Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Jutta Wrage
Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Francesco Poli

Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña

Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Francesco Poli
Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Andrew Donnellan
Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Francesco Poli
Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Andrew Donnellan
Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Francesco Poli
Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Andrew Donnellan

Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Frans Pop

Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña

Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Frans Pop

Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing MJ Ray
Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Don Armstrong

Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Bdale Garbee

Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Francesco Poli

Re: Bug#238245: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña

Re: Bug#238245: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
Re: Bug#238245: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Florian Weimer
Re: Bug#238245: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
Message not available
Re: Bug#238245: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
Re: Bug#238245: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Don Armstrong

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing Nathanael Nerode

Workshop: IPR implications for Free/Libre and Open Source Software Alvaro Martin
software released into public domain Roland Marcus Rutschmann

Re: software released into public domain Andrew Donnellan
Re: software released into public domain Nacho Barrientos Arias
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: software released into public domain Nathanael Nerode

License Licenses (again).... Nathanael Nerode

Re: License Licenses (again).... Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña

Re: License Licenses (again).... Don Armstrong

Re: License Licenses (again).... Joe Smith

Re: License Licenses (again).... Benjamin Seidenberg

A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which? NeuRoTiX

Re: A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which? Don Armstrong

Re: A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which? Ying-Chun Liu

Re: A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which? Andrew Donnellan
Re: A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which? MJ Ray
Re: A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which? Andrew Donnellan
Re: A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which? Don Armstrong

Re: A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which? Francesco Poli

Re: A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which? olive

Re: A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which? Francesco Poli
Re: A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which? Jacobo Tarrio

Re: A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which? NeuRoTiX

Re: A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which? Francesco Poli

bugsx is non-free? Marcin Owsiany

Re: bugsx is non-free? Michael Poole

Packages containing RFCs Simon Josefsson

Re: Packages containing RFCs MJ Ray

Re: Packages containing RFCs Stephen Frost

Re: Packages containing RFCs Simon Josefsson
Re: Packages containing RFCs Stephen Frost
Re: Packages containing RFCs Simon Josefsson

Re: Packages containing RFCs Justin Pryzby

Re: Packages containing RFCs Simon Josefsson

Re: Packages containing RFCs Frank Küster

Re: Packages containing RFCs Francesco Poli

Re: Packages containing RFCs Simon Josefsson
Re: Packages containing RFCs Simon Josefsson

Re: Packages containing RFCs Florian Weimer
Re: Packages containing RFCs Simon Josefsson
Re: Packages containing RFCs Riku Voipio

Re: Packages containing RFCs Paul TBBle Hampson

Is distribution of the maxdb-doc package a GPL violation? Guido Trotter

Re: Is distribution of the maxdb-doc package a GPL violation? Frank Küster

Re: Is distribution of the maxdb-doc package a GPL violation? Joe Smith

Re: Is distribution of the maxdb-doc package a GPL violation? Francesco Poli
Re: Is distribution of the maxdb-doc package a GPL violation? Frank Küster

Re: Is distribution of the maxdb-doc package a GPL violation? Walter Landry

Re: Is distribution of the maxdb-doc package a GPL violation? Francesco Poli

Tremulous packages Heretik

Re: Tremulous packages Joe Smith

Re: Tremulous packages Francesco Poli

Re: Tremulous packages Joe Smith
Re: Tremulous packages Francesco Poli

Re: Tremulous packages Francesco Poli

Re: Tremulous packages Joe Smith

Re: Tremulous packages Francesco Poli

AW: Bug#346354: Is distribution of the maxdb-doc package a GPL violation? debian

Re: AW: Bug#346354: Is distribution of the maxdb-doc package a GPL violation? Walter Landry

Re: Bug#346354: AW: Bug#346354: Is distribution of the maxdb-doc package a GPL violation? Steve Langasek

Re: Bug#346354: AW: Bug#346354: Is distribution of the maxdb-doc package a GPL violation? Josh Triplett
Re: Bug#346354: AW: Bug#346354: Is distribution of the maxdb-doc package a GPL violation? Walter Landry
Re: Bug#346354: AW: Bug#346354: Is distribution of the maxdb-doc package a GPL violation? Steve Langasek

[Fwd: Re: gnome-themes and licensing] Josselin Mouette

Re: [Fwd: Re: gnome-themes and licensing] Andrew Donnellan

Free Art License [was: Re: [Fwd: Re: gnome-themes and licensing]] Francesco Poli

Re: Free Art License Francesco Poli
Re: Free Art License [was: Re: [Fwd: Re: gnome-themes and licensing]] Andrew Donnellan
Re: Free Art License [was: Re: [Fwd: Re: gnome-themes and licensing]] Josselin Mouette

Re: [Fwd: Re: gnome-themes and licensing] Don Armstrong

Re: [Fwd: Re: gnome-themes and licensing] Francesco Poli

licensing of debian/ files Panu Kalliokoski

Re: licensing of debian/ files Wesley J. Landaker

Re: licensing of debian/ files Michael Poole

Re: licensing of debian/ files Francesco Poli

Question about translating and editing gpl document. john skofot

Re: Question about translating and editing gpl document. Don Armstrong
Re: Question about translating and editing gpl document. Frank Küster

left-over non-free license file in .orig tarball Frank Gevaerts

Re: left-over non-free license file in .orig tarball Joe Smith

Fwd: Re: [NONFREE-DOC] RFC1459, 2810-2813: IRC (Internet Relay Chat). Kurt Roeckx

Re: Fwd: Re: [NONFREE-DOC] RFC1459, 2810-2813: IRC (Internet Relay Chat). Francesco Poli

Re: Bug#365390: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and libx264* Steve Langasek
MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and libx264* and other codecs. Matthew William Solloway Bell

Re: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and libx264* and other codecs. Josselin Mouette

Re: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and libx264* and other codecs. Don Armstrong

Re: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and libx264* and other codecs. Måns Rullgård
Re: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and libx264* and other codecs. Stephen Gran
Re: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and libx264* and other codecs. Don Armstrong

Re: [d-i manual] gpl section Geert Stappers

Re: [d-i manual] gpl section Holger Wansing

[Slightly OT] Grant of right to litigate copyright infringment Joe Smith
[chuck@horde.org: Re: [sork] About license of sork modules] Gregory Colpart

Re: [chuck@horde.org: Re: [sork] About license of sork modules] Michael Poole

Re: [chuck@horde.org: Re: [sork] About license of sork modules] Chuck Hagenbuch

Re: [chuck@horde.org: Re: [sork] About license of sork modules] Michael Poole

The last update was on 13:26 GMT Sat May 04. There are 293 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc