On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:55:08 -0400 Joe Smith wrote: > > "Francesco Poli" <frx@firenze.linux.it> wrote in message > [🔎] 20060427230958.053df4db.frx@firenze.linux.it">news:[🔎] 20060427230958.053df4db.frx@firenze.linux.it... > >> > >> > >> A simple clarification from the copyright holders that they will > >not > be enforcing any of the problematic > >> clauses, along with the promise to upgrade to the newer versions of > >CC > when possible should qualify them > >> as free. (We let Mozilla get away with this durring the > >> tre-licencing). So simply get the clarification. > > > >I don't see any similarities with the Mozilla case: Mozilla has been > >going through a slow and difficult relicensing process from a > >non-free status to a DFSG-free one. > >Debian waited until the process ended. > I'm pretty sure Debian did not wait until the process ended. > If it had, Firefox would have only entered Debian around a month ago. Sorry for not being clear enough: what I meant was "Debian hasn't moved Mozilla-* packages to non-free and waited instead until the process ended". I hope this clarifies. > > The similaries may be somewhat limited, but the underlying idea is the > same: some or all of the work is under a licence that is not free, but > upstream has assured us that they > are trying to change the licence of the work to one that is free, and > has assured us that they do not > intend to hold the non-free terms against us before the process has > been complete. > > The only real difference is that is this case, we cannot be 100% sure > that the new licences will be > DFSG-free. I think it's quite a significant difference! > However, correct me if I am wrong, but I was under the > impression that CC has > acknowleged the various problems this list has found, and intends to > correct them. I'm not aware of any promise from CreativeCommons to fix their licenses. I know that they are cooperating with a Debian workgroup, but the final results of this collaboration (that is to say, 3.0 licenses) are still to be disclosed to the public... > > So it is more similar than it may appear. Sorry, but I'm not convinced... -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) ...................................................................... Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpPAlb318zBP.pgp
Description: PGP signature