debian-policy Feb 1999 by subject
![[First Page]](/images/first.png) |
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
![[Last Page]](/images/last.png) |
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
[OTP] Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?
Bug#29874: Optional and conflicting packages.
Re: Bug#29874: optional packages that should be extra
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Bug#31946: AMENDMENT] Adding dpkg-architecture to Packaging Manual
Bug#31946: Last version of diff against packaging manual
Re: Bug#32758: userv: non-maintainer upload (alpha) diffs
Bug#33076: #33076: PROPOSED] Definition of extra priority
Bug#33076: [PROPOSED] Definition of extra priority
Bug#33076: PROPOSED] Definition of extra priority
Bug#33156: debian-policy: Cannot find referenced file in given URL
Bug#33826: section 3.4.2 clarify naming .sh scripts in /etc/init.d/
Debian breaking GPL (Was: Re: Bug#32758: userv: non-maintainer upload (alpha) diffs)
Re: egcc maintainer
Gnome to be removed from debian?
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian? (retracted)
Is HTML compressed?
Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Re: Mechanism for removing developers
Packaging Manual vs. dpkg Programmers' Manual
pending normal debian bugs for Debian Policy List <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>
Policy question
Processed: Re: Bug#29874: Optional and conflicting packages.
Processed: reassign developers-reference bug to developers-reference
reassign developers-reference bug to developers-reference
Re: Resolutions to comments on LSB-FHS-TS_SPEC_V1.0
smarter way to differ architectures needed?
Suggestion [ Was: Re: Gnome to be removed from debian? (retracted) ]
update-rc.d
Why -g flag?
The last update was on 15:38 GMT Sat May 11. There are 159 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc
