Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?

[Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>]

On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:

> Previously Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Is this to be considered "distribution-wise"?
> > i.e. Is this to be applied to hamm, slink, potato, in an independent way?
> 
> I think so, because packages that may be required in release N could
> be obsolete in release N+1 and deserve a lower priority there.
> 
> Wichert (wondering if he missed something here)

Thanks for answering. So: what's the right priority for a library in
slink for which an important package in slink depends on?

-- 
 "5e8f0217751d1f8d6f855fbd12863082" (a truly random sig)