debian-policy Feb 1999 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Re: Bug#29874: optional packages that should be extra
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#29874: optional packages that should be extra
Joseph Carter
Bug#29874: Optional and conflicting packages.
Santiago Vila
<Possible follow-ups>
Bug#29874: Optional and conflicting packages.
Santiago Vila
Re: Bug#29874: Optional and conflicting packages.
Branden Robinson
Re: Bug#29874: Optional and conflicting packages.
Santiago Vila
Bug#29874: Optional and conflicting packages.
Santiago Vila
Processed: Re: Bug#29874: Optional and conflicting packages.
Debian Bug Tracking System
Policy question
John Goerzen
Re: Policy question
Jules Bean
Re: Policy question
John Goerzen
Re: Policy question
Jules Bean
Re: Policy question
Jonathan P Tomer
Re: Policy question
Julian Gilbey
Re: Policy question
John Goerzen
Re: Policy question
Julian Gilbey
Re: Policy question
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Policy question
Ian Jackson
Re: Policy question
John Goerzen
Re: Policy question
Jules Bean
Re: Policy question
Ian Jackson
Re: Policy question
John Goerzen
Re: Policy question
Kai Henningsen
Bug#31946: AMENDMENT] Adding dpkg-architecture to Packaging Manual
Marcus Brinkmann
Bug#31946: AMENDMENT] Adding dpkg-architecture to Packaging Manual
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#31946: AMENDMENT] Adding dpkg-architecture to Packaging Manual
Marcus Brinkmann
Bug#31946: AMENDMENT] Adding dpkg-architecture to Packaging Manual
Mark Baker
Bug#31946: AMENDMENT] Adding dpkg-architecture to Packaging Manual
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: egcc maintainer
Ian Jackson
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Ian Jackson - Debian Project Leader
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Manoj Srivastava
<Possible follow-ups>
Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Ian Jackson
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy
Manoj Srivastava
Packaging Manual vs. dpkg Programmers' Manual
Ian Jackson
Re: Packaging Manual vs. dpkg Programmers' Manual
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#32758: userv: non-maintainer upload (alpha) diffs
Ian Jackson
Re: Resolutions to comments on LSB-FHS-TS_SPEC_V1.0
Ian Jackson
Re: Mechanism for removing developers
Ian Jackson
Re: Mechanism for removing developers
John Goerzen
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Mechanism for removing developers
Martin Schulze
Re: Mechanism for removing developers
Hartmut Koptein
Debian breaking GPL (Was: Re: Bug#32758: userv: non-maintainer upload (alpha) diffs)
Brederlow
Re: Debian breaking GPL (Was: Re: Bug#32758: userv: non-maintainer upload (alpha) diffs)
Richard Braakman
Re: Debian breaking GPL (Was: Re: Bug#32758: userv: non-maintainer upload (alpha) diffs)
Brederlow
Re: Debian breaking GPL (Was: Re: Bug#32758: userv: non-maintainer upload (alpha) diffs)
Richard Braakman
Re: Debian breaking GPL (Was: Re: Bug#32758: userv: non-maintainer upload (alpha) diffs)
Guy Maor
update-rc.d
Anthony Towns
RE: update-rc.d
Shaleh
Bug#33076: [PROPOSED] Definition of extra priority
Santiago Vila
Bug#33076: PROPOSED] Definition of extra priority
Peter S Galbraith
Bug#33076: PROPOSED] Definition of extra priority
Jules Bean
Re: Bug#33076: [PROPOSED] Definition of extra priority
M.C. Vernon
Bug#33076: PROPOSED] Definition of extra priority
Santiago Vila
Bug#33076: PROPOSED] Definition of extra priority
Jules Bean
Bug#33076: #33076: PROPOSED] Definition of extra priority
Santiago Vila
Bug#33076: #33076: PROPOSED] Definition of extra priority
Jules Bean
smarter way to differ architectures needed?
Marcus Brinkmann
RE: smarter way to differ architectures needed?
Shaleh
Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?
Joseph Carter
Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?
Mark W. Eichin
Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?
Marco d'Itri
Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?
Shaleh
Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?
Hamish Moffatt
Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?
Tommi Virtanen
Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?
Gordon Matzigkeit
Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?
Guy Maor
Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?
Wichert Akkerman
[OTP] Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?
Aaron Van Couwenberghe
Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?
Guy Maor
Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?
Kai Henningsen
Bug#33156: debian-policy: Cannot find referenced file in given URL
Bob Hilliard
Bug#33156: debian-policy: Cannot find referenced file in given URL
J.H.M. Dassen
Bug#33156: debian-policy: Cannot find referenced file in given URL
Hamish Moffatt
Bug#33156: debian-policy: Cannot find referenced file in given URL
Brederlow
Re: Bug#33156: debian-policy: Cannot find referenced file in given URL
Hamish Moffatt
Re: Bug#33156: debian-policy: Cannot find referenced file in given URL
Joey Hess
reassign developers-reference bug to developers-reference
Adam Di Carlo
Processed: reassign developers-reference bug to developers-reference
Debian Bug Tracking System
Gnome to be removed from debian?
Adam Heath
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
Stephen Crowley
RE: Gnome to be removed from debian?
Shaleh
RE: Gnome to be removed from debian?
Havoc Pennington
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
Darren Benham
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
David Starner
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
John Goerzen
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
Stephen Crowley
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
Havoc Pennington
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
Ben Collins
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
Josip Rodin
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
Joey Hess
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
Ben Collins
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
James Troup
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
Ben Collins
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
Brederlow
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
Martin Schulze
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian? (retracted)
Adam Heath
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
Brederlow
Re: Gnome to be removed from debian?
Martin Schulze
Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Santiago Vila
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Richard Braakman
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Santiago Vila
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Martin Schulze
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Santiago Vila
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Martin Schulze
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Brian White
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Santiago Vila
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Santiago Vila
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Santiago Vila
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Joseph Carter
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Santiago Vila
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Jules Bean
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Santiago Vila Doncel
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Jules Bean
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Santiago Vila Doncel
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Martin Schulze
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Santiago Vila
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Martin Schulze
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Joey Hess
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Richard Braakman
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Joey Hess
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Guy Maor
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
James Troup
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Jules Bean
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Joey Hess
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Richard Braakman
Re: Is the dependency rule distribution-wise?
Guy Maor
pending normal debian bugs for Debian Policy List <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>
Nag
Why -g flag?
Julian Gilbey
RE: Why -g flag?
Shaleh
Re: Why -g flag?
Erick Kinnee
Re: Why -g flag?
Richard Braakman
Re: Why -g flag?
Julian Gilbey
Re: Why -g flag?
Gergely Madarasz
Re: Why -g flag?
Joseph Carter
Re: Why -g flag?
Richard Braakman
Re: Why -g flag?
John Goerzen
Re: Why -g flag?
Joseph Carter
Re: Why -g flag?
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Why -g flag?
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: Why -g flag?
Joseph Carter
Re: Why -g flag?
Brederlow
Suggestion [ Was: Re: Gnome to be removed from debian? (retracted) ]
Brederlow
Bug#31946: Last version of diff against packaging manual
Marcus Brinkmann
Bug#33826: section 3.4.2 clarify naming .sh scripts in /etc/init.d/
Richard Hawes
Is HTML compressed?
Adrian Bridgett
RE: Is HTML compressed?
Shaleh
RE: Is HTML compressed?
Santiago Vila
Re: Is HTML compressed?
Guy Maor
The last update was on 15:38 GMT Sat May 11. There are 159 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc