Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed?
On Tue, Feb 09, 1999 at 03:54:42AM -0800, Guy Maor wrote:
> b looks like a reasonable solution, and would not be hard to
> implement. Of course, as you said, if only a handful of packages are
> affected, then it's less work to do c.
("b" was about a System: field along to Architecture:)
Can you estimate the time you need to prepare this? Can I start to work out
the details for a policy proposal?
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org finger brinkmd@
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org master.debian.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de for public PGP Key
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
Reply to: