[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#33076: PROPOSED] Definition of extra priority



Ok. To make it fully clear, I hereby change my earlier proposal to
this one:

extra

"This contains all packages that conflict with others with required,
important, standard or optional priorities, or are only likely to be
useful if you already know what they are or have specialised requirements."


The difference with respect to the previous proposal is merely the
addition of the "all" word, as suggested by Stephen Zander, so that it is
clearly understood that whenever a package fits this description, it has
to be of extra priority.


[ Mmm, do I need seconds again? ]


Thanks.

-- 
 "e2d7f2692904f9118e32bceae143aa90" (a truly random sig)


Reply to: