Re: Bug#29874: optional packages that should be extra
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 01:26:03AM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > * To decide which of the two is better, cooler, or nicer, and mark the
> > other as extra.
> >
> > * Or to repackage them so that they are compatible, like pgp-i and pgp-us
> > (update-alternatives is our friend).
>
> Or more likely when the first option fails in a flame war and the second is
> impractical, demote them both to extra.
<waiting for gtk*-dev to become extra>
--
Anticipation is the sweetest form of torture...
Reply to: