Bug#33076: PROPOSED] Definition of extra priority

[Peter S Galbraith <psg@debian.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


I second this proposal.

Santiago Vila wrote:

> I propose that we clarify this by saying explicitly which are the
> priorities higher than extra. The modified wording would be:
> 
> 
> "This contains packages that conflict with others with required,
> important, standard or optional priorities, or are only likely to be
> useful if you already know what they are or have specialised requirements."
> 
> 
> I am now looking for seconds for this proposal.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBNr70SbwVH8jSqROhAQGywAQAmBiV1yyKexDsZG28Uc1W1HIoWAXYmEth
RBF2ZiWjADLp8z4hmxgJivyyl/vFbcBKK76wVXnNxjZ/pNIR19qj6A/lRfHhmWzs
7etjF/R5J3cZt40fvV8cbXZuz+XrtDomZGDy3CggsVPVPoQpRXAzK3VxoNNHxruy
A+GdLcCLsg4=
=unZC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----