debian-legal Jul 2002 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 2 of 2 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Re: Non-US definition Obnoxious ad-clause strikes again. OT: file renaming requirements - any prior art? PDFlib license clarification request Pledge of Allegiance. Please forward Re: Question(s) for clarifications with respect to the LPPL discussion Re: Question(s) for clarifications with respect to the LPPL discussion Re: Question(s) for clarifications with respect to the LPPL discussion Re: Question(s) for clarifications with respect to the LPPL discussion Re: Question(s) for clarifications with respect to the LPPL discussion Re: Question(s) for clarifications with respect to the LPPL discussion Question(s) for clarifications with respect to the LPPL discussion RealNetworks wants to go open source RFC: Myricom GM message passing system packaging silc thingies spokesman (was Re: User's thoughts about LPPL) Standartization and TeX Re: Suggestion for dual-licensed LaTeX (was Re: Encoding the name Re: Suggestion for dual-licensed LaTeX (was Re: Encoding the name in the file contents (was Re: Towards a new LPPL draft)) Re: Suggestion for dual-licensed LaTeX (was Re: Encoding the name in the file contents (was Re: Towards a new LPPL draft)) Suggestion for dual-licensed LaTeX (was Re: Encoding the name in the file contents (was Re: Towards a new LPPL draft)) Re: Summary Summary (was: Distributing GPL Software as binary ISO) tetex/tex license Towards a new LPPL draft Re: Transitive closure of licenses Unidentified subject! User's thoughts about LPPL what is allowed with TeX and CM fonts (was Re: User's thoughts about LPPL) The last update was on 08:22 GMT Fri May 06. There are 754 messages. Page 2 of 2.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 2 of 2
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc