Re: Suggestion for dual-licensed LaTeX (was Re: Encoding the name in the file contents (was Re: Towards a new LPPL draft))

To: Boris Veytsman <borisv@lk.net>
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Suggestion for dual-licensed LaTeX (was Re: Encoding the name in the file contents (was Re: Towards a new LPPL draft))
From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
Date: 26 Jul 2002 13:15:44 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] yahit32kae7.fsf@pc-043.diku.dk>
In-reply-to: Boris Veytsman's message of "Thu, 25 Jul 2002 20:53:35 -0400"
References: <[🔎] 200207251548.g6PFmbVK007185@bilbo.localnet> <[🔎] jvpn0sf1zbu.fsf@woodcarver.kendall.akamai.com> <[🔎] 200207251957.g6PJvaS9009358@bilbo.localnet> <[🔎] jvpu1mnzd9r.fsf@woodcarver.kendall.akamai.com> <[🔎] 200207260053.g6Q0rZZ6012222@bilbo.localnet>

Scripsit Boris Veytsman <borisv@lk.net>

> If you create non-LaTeX,  you can move files outside the tree, and
> then you are completely free to do whatever you want.

Please substantiate this claim with quotes from the license.

-- 
Henning Makholm         "Vend dig ikke om! Det er et meget ubehageligt syn!"


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Suggestion for dual-licensed LaTeX (was Re: Encoding the name in the file contents (was Re: Towards a new LPPL draft))
  - From: Boris Veytsman <borisv@lk.net>

References:
- Re: Suggestion for dual-licensed LaTeX (was Re: Encoding the name in the file contents (was Re: Towards a new LPPL draft))
  - From: Boris Veytsman <borisv@lk.net>
- Re: Suggestion for dual-licensed LaTeX (was Re: Encoding the name in the file contents (was Re: Towards a new LPPL draft))
  - From: Brian Sniffen <bts@alum.mit.edu>
- Re: Suggestion for dual-licensed LaTeX (was Re: Encoding the name in the file contents (was Re: Towards a new LPPL draft))
  - From: Boris Veytsman <borisv@lk.net>
- Re: Suggestion for dual-licensed LaTeX (was Re: Encoding the name in the file contents (was Re: Towards a new LPPL draft))
  - From: Brian Sniffen <bts@alum.mit.edu>
- Re: Suggestion for dual-licensed LaTeX (was Re: Encoding the name in the file contents (was Re: Towards a new LPPL draft))
  - From: Boris Veytsman <borisv@lk.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Encoding the name in the file contents (was Re: Towards a new LPPL draft)
Next by Date: Re: Concluding the LPPL debate, try 2
Previous by thread: Re: Suggestion for dual-licensed LaTeX (was Re: Encoding the name in the file contents (was Re: Towards a new LPPL draft))
Next by thread: Re: Suggestion for dual-licensed LaTeX (was Re: Encoding the name in the file contents (was Re: Towards a new LPPL draft))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread