Re: Towards a new LPPL draft
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Frank Mittelbach <frank.mittelbach@latex-project.org> writes:
> > 2) Does the draft LPPL prevent me from distributing a program called
> > "SniffenTeX" which is a modified derivative work of LaTeX, but
> > would be run by a user as sniffentex and carries a banner stating
> > that it is SniffenTeX, not LaTeX? If it doesn't prevent me, what
> > restrictions does it place on me?
>
> as of now it would mean that for each individual work under LPPL you have to
> folow its license meaning you have to rename the work (i thought that was
> discussed on the list at some detail) --- all of these works could live side
> by side on your machine
That's the important bit, and what I wanted to make sure I'd clearly
understood from you (I think most folks on debian-legal believe
differently): if I rename the *work*, I don't have to rename the
files I change within it. Is this correct?
- -Brian
- --
Brian Sniffen bts@alum.mit.edu
http://www.evenmere.org/~bts/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9PViH03mlJHngJfERAss5AJ9PsAGz7VemPaZUwG2BA6jYgzCKygCeLPsq
g7MamrPGEOcqYoMMeP4rPnM=
=ZI3V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: