debian-policy Sep 2000 by subject
![[First Page]](/images/first.png) |
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
![[Last Page]](/images/last.png) |
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
[no subject]
Re: : Question regarding actions to take on --purge of a package.
about the architecture field
Bug#20373: Code ready for partial solution
Bug#66023: lintian lives!
Bug#69229: [ACCEPTED 2000/09/08] Free pkgs depending on non-US should go into non-US/{main,contrib}
Re: Bug#70269: automatic build fails for potato
Bug#70742: packaging-manual: doesn't list Format: field
Bug#71323: packaging-manual: old-style source error
Bug#71445: dpkg-shlibdeps usage instructions are wrong
Bug#71621: No policy on calling update-alternatives (was Re: update-alternatives)
Bug#72335: [PROPOSED] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules
Bug#72335: PROPOSED] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules
Bug#72787: minimum Standards-Version for woody
Bug#72849: policy: advises to use -s flag to install in wrong place
missing link to package creator FAQ
New packaging manual draft
Re: Preparing Debian for using capabilities
Preparing Debian for using capabilities: file ownership.
Processed: [ACCEPTED 2000/09/08] Free pkgs depending on non-US should go into non-US/{main,contrib}
section 4.7.4 is poorly worded
A thought on urgency
The last update was on 06:40 GMT Sat May 11. There are 131 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc
