Re: section 4.7.4 is poorly worded

To: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: section 4.7.4 is poorly worded
From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shaleh@valinux.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 12:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] XFMail.20000928124000.shaleh@valinux.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000928213344.B29573@cibalia.gkvk.hr>

> 
> FWIW I understood them both just fine. I think it was changed because "may"
> and "must" have explicit meanings now...
> 

It is rather close to reading as a double negative.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: section 4.7.4 is poorly worded
  - From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>

Prev by Date: Re: section 4.7.4 is poorly worded
Next by Date: Re: section 4.7.4 is poorly worded
Previous by thread: Re: section 4.7.4 is poorly worded
Next by thread: Re: section 4.7.4 is poorly worded
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread