Re: New packaging manual draft
>>"Joey" == Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> writes:
Joey> Um, I'm not talking about the parameters passed to the scripts or their
Joey> ordering. I'm talking about asides documenting internal dpkg
Joey> limitations, that should not be put into policy.
I agree with you in principle. In the case of the point of no
return, I do not see that as a dpkg limitation, I see that as a
standard point of no return, and that I can potentially use that
information in coding the behaviour of my scripts.
I'll be happy to be shown why this is a silly idea.
manoj
--
They are called computers simply because computation is the only
significant job that has so far been given to them.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: