debian-legal Sep 2012 by thread

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Zoot Zoot

Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Francesco Poli

Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Zoot Zoot

Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Simon Chopin
Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Gunnar Wolf

Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Zoot Zoot

Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Ben Finney

Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Jeremy Bicha

Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Zoot Zoot

Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Paul Wise

Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Paul Wise

Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Zoot Zoot

Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Paul Wise

Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Josue Abarca
Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Osamu Aoki

Question about a copyright file. Grant H.

Re: Question about a copyright file. Francesco Poli

Re: Re: Question about a copyright file. Grant H.

Other search engine suggestion/tip findthatfile
New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Sian Mountbatten

Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Paul Tagliamonte

Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Paul Tagliamonte

Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Christofer C. Bell
Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Paul Wise
Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Steve McIntyre
Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Francesco Poli
Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Steve McIntyre
Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Charles Plessy
"dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Osamu Aoki
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Bernhard R. Link
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Osamu Aoki
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Bernhard R. Link
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Osamu Aoki
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Bernhard R. Link
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Steve Langasek
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Paul Tagliamonte
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Osamu Aoki
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more MJ Ray
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Francesco Poli
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Francesco Poli
Retract: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Osamu Aoki

Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Paul Wise

Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Francesco Poli
Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Osamu Aoki

Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Francesco Poli

Debian Derivative any legal questions? anotst01

Re: Debian Derivative any legal questions? Paul Wise

Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Eric Smith

Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Ben Finney

Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Ben Finney

Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Bernhard R. Link

Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Eric Smith

Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Ben Finney

Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Steve Langasek

Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Eric Smith

Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Bernhard R. Link
Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Christofer C. Bell
Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Steve Langasek

Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Ken Arromdee

Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Steve Langasek
Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Ken Arromdee

Re: Bug#687693: ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing Raphael Geissert

Message not available
- Bug#687693: marked as forwarded (ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing) Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Bug#687693: ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing Francesco Poli
Re: Bug#687693: ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing Florian Weimer
Re: Bug#687693: ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing Charles Plessy

SFC's guide to managing copyright Information within a Free Software project Paul Wise
Non-DFSG license change by original author Olе Streicher

Re: Non-DFSG license change by original author Bart Martens

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? Francesco Poli

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? Clint Adams

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? Francesco Poli

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? Charles Plessy
Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? Francesco Poli
Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? Rox 64
Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? Francesco Poli

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? Stefano Zacchiroli

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? Francesco Poli

Analysis of the Academic Free License ("AFL") v3.0 Francesco Poli

Re: Analysis of the Academic Free License ("AFL") v3.0 Francesco Poli

Re: Bug#681654: About kstars-data-extra-tycho2 distributability anarcat

The last update was on 19:27 GMT Wed May 01. There are 81 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc