debian-legal Sep 2012 by date

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Sep 01

Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Zoot Zoot
Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Francesco Poli
Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Zoot Zoot
Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Simon Chopin
Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Gunnar Wolf

Sep 02

Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Jeremy Bicha
Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Zoot Zoot
Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Zoot Zoot
Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Paul Wise
Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Paul Wise
Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Zoot Zoot
Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Ben Finney
Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Paul Wise
Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Josue Abarca

Sep 06

Re: Attribution with CC-BY-SA 3.0 Osamu Aoki

Sep 10

Question about a copyright file. Grant H.

Sep 11

Re: Question about a copyright file. Francesco Poli
Other search engine suggestion/tip findthatfile

Sep 12

Re: Re: Question about a copyright file. Grant H.
New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Sian Mountbatten
Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Paul Tagliamonte
Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Paul Tagliamonte
Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Paul Wise
Debian Derivative any legal questions? anotst01
Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Francesco Poli

Sep 13

Re: Debian Derivative any legal questions? Paul Wise

Sep 15

Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Eric Smith
Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Ben Finney
Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Ben Finney
Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Bernhard R. Link
Re: Bug#687693: ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing Raphael Geissert
Bug#687693: marked as forwarded (ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing) Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Steve Langasek
Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Eric Smith
Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Christofer C. Bell

Sep 16

Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Paul Wise
Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Eric Smith
Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Bernhard R. Link
Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Christofer C. Bell
Re: Bug#687693: ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing Francesco Poli
Re: Bug#687693: ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing Florian Weimer
Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Steve McIntyre
Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Francesco Poli
Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Ben Finney
Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Steve McIntyre
Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Steve Langasek

Sep 17

Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Charles Plessy
Re: Bug#687693: ca-certificates: Cacert License is missing Charles Plessy
Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Ken Arromdee

Sep 18

SFC's guide to managing copyright Information within a Free Software project Paul Wise
Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Steve Langasek
Non-DFSG license change by original author Olе Streicher
Re: Non-DFSG license change by original author Bart Martens
Re: Java3D license incompatible with DFSG? Ken Arromdee

Sep 20

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? Francesco Poli
Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? Clint Adams

Sep 21

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? Stefano Zacchiroli

Sep 22

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? Francesco Poli
Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? Francesco Poli
Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? Charles Plessy

Sep 23

Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? Francesco Poli
Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? Rox 64
Re: Why LGPLv3/CC-by-sa-v3.0 for the logo? Francesco Poli

Sep 24

"dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Osamu Aoki
Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Osamu Aoki
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Bernhard R. Link
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Paul Tagliamonte
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Osamu Aoki
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Bernhard R. Link
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Osamu Aoki
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Osamu Aoki
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Bernhard R. Link
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more MJ Ray
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Francesco Poli
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Steve Langasek
Re: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Francesco Poli
Re: New package algol68toc: terms of the copyright. Francesco Poli

Sep 30

Retract: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more Osamu Aoki
Analysis of the Academic Free License ("AFL") v3.0 Francesco Poli
Re: Analysis of the Academic Free License ("AFL") v3.0 Francesco Poli
Re: Bug#681654: About kstars-data-extra-tycho2 distributability anarcat

The last update was on 19:27 GMT Wed May 01. There are 81 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc