Retract: "dissident test" has been proven wrong and should not be used any more
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:04:22PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Agh ... who added this ... test should be done only to DFSG. The
> proposed "dissident test" does not work and is proven to be wrong in
> some cases already.
Let me make this simple. I retract this general statement.
What I had problem was discussion of "dissident test" to the disclaimer
related to "NO WARRANTY". The "dissident test" itself used against main
licensing condition is fine.