debian-qa May 2010 by subject
|
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
|
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Bug#576240: say what ITP means right there in the report
Bug#581169: marked as done (qa.debian.org: sf.net debian/watch file redirector fails to find new upstream release)
Bug#581169: qa.debian.org: sf.net debian/watch file redirector fails to find new upstream release
Bug#581622: [qa.debian.org] Please provide a code.google.com redirector
Bug#581752: qa.debian.org: watch file redirect service
Bug#582038: qa.debian.org: [PTS] Please link to UbuntuDiff
Bug#582293: qa.debian.org: not all ITA bugs are listed on my qa page
Bug#582725: marked as done (packages.qa.debian.org do not link to l10n status for some packages)
Bug#582725: packages.qa.debian.org do not link to l10n status for some packages
Bug#583381: http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openswan.html reports wrong open security issue
Bug#583489: qa.debian.org: Please provide 1.0 (explicit) and 1.0 (implicit) information
debcheck: "Arch: all" package pulls non-linux package by Recommends
Dependability of Debian
Package priorities: proposed override changes (and a tool to find them)
pilot-qof & dpkg-cross reports in PTS
Processed: forcibly merging 579538 498313
Processed: Re: Bug#581622: [qa.debian.org] Please provide a code.google.com redirector
Processed: reassign 583381 to qa.debian.org,security.debian.org
Race condition ? (Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP)
retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP
RFS for Denemo, previously uploaded as qa-upload.
Too much disruptive NMUs
The last update was on 07:23 GMT Fri Jun 07. There are 92 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc