debian-qa May 2010 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Bug#576240: say what ITP means right there in the report Bug#581169: marked as done (qa.debian.org: sf.net debian/watch file redirector fails to find new upstream release) Bug#581169: qa.debian.org: sf.net debian/watch file redirector fails to find new upstream release Bug#581622: [qa.debian.org] Please provide a code.google.com redirector Bug#581752: qa.debian.org: watch file redirect service Bug#582038: qa.debian.org: [PTS] Please link to UbuntuDiff Bug#582293: qa.debian.org: not all ITA bugs are listed on my qa page Bug#582725: marked as done (packages.qa.debian.org do not link to l10n status for some packages) Bug#582725: packages.qa.debian.org do not link to l10n status for some packages Bug#583381: http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openswan.html reports wrong open security issue Bug#583489: qa.debian.org: Please provide 1.0 (explicit) and 1.0 (implicit) information debcheck: "Arch: all" package pulls non-linux package by Recommends Dependability of Debian Package priorities: proposed override changes (and a tool to find them) pilot-qof & dpkg-cross reports in PTS Processed: forcibly merging 579538 498313 Processed: Re: Bug#581622: [qa.debian.org] Please provide a code.google.com redirector Processed: reassign 583381 to qa.debian.org,security.debian.org Race condition ? (Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP) retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP RFS for Denemo, previously uploaded as qa-upload. Too much disruptive NMUs The last update was on 07:23 GMT Fri Jun 07. There are 92 messages. Page 1 of 1.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc