Bug#582725: packages.qa.debian.org do not link to l10n status for some packages
Hello,
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:47:59PM +0200, zack@debian.org wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:14:40AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > What does that mean? There are several languages provided by for
> > example debian-installer that have not translated sysvinit, this there
> > are translations missing as far as I see it. Even for
> > popularity-contest, the 'se' translation is missing.
>
> Right, this is the other half of the issue. I've implemented the half of
> the issue concerning the PTS a while ago, together with Nicolas François
> (Cc:-ed).
>
> The actual definition of "there is l10n work to do" is not up to the
> PTS, but up to the l10n data which the PTS retrieves. IIRC, back than
> the suggestion by Nicolas was to show as "needs work" stuff for which
> translation exists but are not up to date, but not stuff for which a
> translation has never really existed (beware: I might be wrong on this,
> better wait for feedback from Nicolas).
Yes, this is the current way we measure the need for work. There are less
than 10 teams really active who wish to get everything translated, so
focusing on the maintenance of existing translation was the goal here.
This could improve by differentiating more on the kind of translation
(debconf, bianries, documentation) and the kind of package (upstream,
debian, installer) and maybe on the translation team, but would require
also more effort to generate the list.
Best Regards,
--
Nekral
Reply to: