Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP
On 25/05/10 at 21:46 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Le lundi 24 mai 2010 à 21:27 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > David Moreno Garza used to run a script that retitled old ITA/ITP bugs
> > to O/RFP. Since this was a useful service, I reimplemented it, and have
> > been running it today with fairly conservative settings (18 months of
> > inactivity for both ITP and ITA). (the script is available in
> > collab-qa/retitle-old-ita-itp -- it's not run by cron yet ; see #501257
> > for an example bug modified by the script)
> >
> > It seems to me that this 18 months delay is too much. I'm not sure if
> > someone has done the data-mining for that, but I think that most
> > "successful" ITP/ITA are processed quite fast (in less than a month).
> >
> > So, I'd like to run the script with more aggressive settings, like "3
> > months of complete inactivity" for both ITP and ITA.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> Maybe just reverting to prior state : if RFP before ITP, then revert to
> RFP, otherwise, if direct ITP, then close ...
That would indeed be the solution that makes the most sense. The problem
is that "prior state" might be quite hard to determine.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Reply to: