[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Too much disruptive NMUs



On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:49:10PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > For instance, NMU are allowed for important bugs (see the suggested
> > upload delays in devref §5.11.1) and fixing those does not qualify as
> > making cosmetic changes; well, at least it does not according to my own
> > interpretation of it.
> Things like "adding a homepage field, fiddling with debhelper compat stuff"
> and so on does not count as bug fixing for me, especialy if there is no open
> bug for it. 

I don't see how this is an objection to what I wrote above.

(FWIW and just to stress it: I agree with what you wrote.)

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..|  .  |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: