Hi, On Dienstag, 25. Mai 2010, Charles Plessy wrote: > - 18 months delay may be shortenend to six monthes or 1 year, but I think > that 3 months is too short, unless the goal is really to make people close > their ITPs. I do not think that ITPs are discouraging people to contribute. > In contrary, I hope it helps developers to coordinate their efforts. Some > programs need time for packaging, and it would be a waste if two packages > are prepared in parallel because of a lack of information. +1 from me. More frequent pings, like every 3 months or maybe 2 even, OTOH, I'd say would be useful to stimulate the wanna-be maintainers to get the work done. I think closing an ITP after a year is reasonable, earlier I think is annoying. cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.