debian-policy Apr 2001 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Re: Are build-dependancies mandatory? Bug#42052: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 2/4/01] /var/mail and /var/spool/mail) Bug#53582: PROPOSAL] base section: let's get rid of this one at last Bug#66023: [olly@lfix.co.uk: Re: Old proposals again (Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.)] Bug#66023: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins. Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins. Bug#66023: [shaleh@valinux.com: Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.] Bug#72335: PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules Bug#76868: AMENDMENT 2001-02-27] invoke-rc.d interface to invoke initscripts Bug#79538: Reassign to dh-make Bug#79541: include the apache license in base-files Bug#80343: general -> debian-policy Bug#83977: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 26/04/2001] include Perl Policy) Bug#83977: PROPOSED] include Perl Policy Bug#85503: marked as done (section 3.1 of policy is confused) Bug#86436: marked as done (Build-Depends: should vs may) Bug#86507: marked as done (recommends removed package) Bug#87007: marked as done ([TYPO] policy: ch sect 2.2 "to to" --> "to do") Bug#87159: marked as done (explanation of Build-Depends et. al. is unclear) Bug#87233: marked as done (wording in section 9.2.2 could be better) Bug#87711: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 29/03/2001] Clarification of example configuration files) Bug#87828: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 14/03/2001] Deprecate confusing Build-Depends arch syntax) Bug#87994: PROPOSAL] better initscript definition, and adding 'restart-if-running' Bug#88651: marked as done (debian-policy: Section 3.2 refers to packaging manual) Bug#88788: marked as done (debian-policy: Typo in copyright notice) Bug#89038: the informatoion in the manpage should be in policy Bug#89039: Not policy's job? Bug#90989: Processed: drop #90989 Bug#91276: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 2001/03/26] update policy to match new serious severity) Bug#92423: FWD: Bug#92423: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file) Bug#92423: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file) Bug#92423: [PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file Bug#92423: PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file Bug#92589: marked as done (there is no standard way to check if an init script is installed) Bug#92589: there is no standard way to check if an init script is installed Bug#92744: Section 10.1.2., better example Re: Bug#92981: uw-imapd-ssl: can't use maildir format with uw-imap (fwd) Bug#93047: debian-policy: tells "GNU Public Licence" Bug#93047: marked as done ([TYPO] policy: "GNU Public Licence" --> "GNU GPL") Bug#93295: example contradicting rationale in chapter 11 (Diversions) Re: Bug#93620: ftp.debian.org: debian-policy recommends a nonexistent package Bug#93620: marked as done (ftp.debian.org: debian-policy recommends a nonexistent package) Bug#93705: marked as done (packaging-manual not available in sid) Bug#93705: packaging-manual not available in sid Bug#93724: base-files: please move undocumented(7) from manpages Bug#93724: base-files: please move undocumented(7) from manpages (fwd) Bug#93975: Make shared libs non-mandatory. Re: Bug#94114: mesag3-glide2: mesag3-glide2 needs MESA_GLX_FX Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper Bug#94995: [PROPOSAL] Clarifying instructions on linking man pages Bug#94995: PROPOSAL] Clarifying instructions on linking man pages Bug#95065: Checklist is wrong on location of examples files Bug#95065: marked as done (Checklist is wrong on location of examples files) Bug#95906: debian-policy: Debian policy manual description should mention the packaging manual incorporation Clarifying instructions on linking man pages compressed binaries in packages, for or against? CVS jdg: * Change names of policy maintainers (finish the job) CVS jdg: Chapter 4 done CVS jdg: * Corrections to chapter 6 CVS jdg: * Couple of minor changes reported CVS jdg: Finished chapter 2 CVS jdg: Finished up chapter 5 changes CVS jdg: * Finished updates to chapter 7 CVS jdg: * Get the version.ent non-compression thingy right this time! CVS jdg: Improvements to chapter 3 CVS jdg: * Improvements to section 7.1 CVS jdg: * Improvements to sections 5.1 and 5.2. CVS jdg: * Make # in closes: regexp optional, as in latest dpkg-dev CVS jdg: * Typos in various documents CVS log messages CVS srivasta: * [ACCEPTED 2/4/01] /var/mail and /var/spool/mail closes: Bug#42052 CVS srivasta: Fix breakage in the rules file CVS srivasta: Removed illegasl tag <ital>; changed it to <em> CVS srivasta: * Removed recommendation on packaging-manual CVS srivasta: TeX got confused by the new perl regexpo in policy; had to create a woraround to package policy debian-policy_3.5.3.0_i386.changes INSTALLED debian-policy_3.5.4.0_i386.changes INSTALLED Definition of alphanumeric? Definition of Binary field in control file Fixed in NMU of debian-policy 3.5.3.0 Fixed in NMU of debian-policy 3.5.4.0 Help wanted Must and should again Must and should: new proposal (was: Re: Must and should again) New versions of the FHS Old proposals again (Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.) Policy for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS Policy for stripping binaries Re: Policy reformatting Policy rewrite: chaps 11-13 Processed: 3 accepted X policy proposals Processed: accepted proposal Processed: another accepted X policy proposal Processed: Bug#79541: include the apache license in base-files Processed: Bug#80343: general -> debian-policy Processed: Bug#93724: base-files: please move undocumented(7) from manpages Processed: closing (bah) Processed: drop #90989 Processed: Fixed in NMU of debian-policy 3.5.3.0 Processed: Fixed in NMU of debian-policy 3.5.4.0 Processed: FWD: Bug#92423: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file) Processed: Merge policy bugs - take 2 Processed: Merging invoke-rc.d stuff Processed: reassign Processed: Reassign to dh-make Processed: Re: Bug#83977: PROPOSED] include Perl Policy Processed: Re: Bug#93620: ftp.debian.org: debian-policy recommends a nonexistent package Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#93705: packaging-manual not available in sid Processed: [sarnold@willamette.edu: Re: Help wanted] Processed: try again [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins. Proposed solution to config.{sub,guess} issues [retracted] sarnold's policy diff for .so files Shared libs vs. plugins. .text or .txt [Typos] Debian policy Unidentified subject! The last update was on 18:34 GMT Sun Aug 16. There are 292 messages. Page 1 of 1.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc