Re: compressed binaries in packages, for or against?

To: Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <shaleh@valinux.com>
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: compressed binaries in packages, for or against?
From: Itai Zukerman <zukerman@math-hat.com>
Date: 21 Apr 2001 18:47:08 -0400
Message-id: <87u23hg9ar.fsf@matt.w80.math-hat.com>
In-reply-to: <20010421133636.D3658@valinux.com>
References: <20010421133636.D3658@valinux.com>

On Sat, 21 Apr 2001 13:36:36 -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <shaleh@valinux.com> wrote:
> I was recently mailed about lintian failing on UPX compressed binaries in
> packages.

How does it fail?  (In what way do the compressed binaries not conform
to policy?)

-itai

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: compressed binaries in packages, for or against?
  - From: Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <shaleh@valinux.com>

References:
- compressed binaries in packages, for or against?
  - From: Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <shaleh@valinux.com>

Prev by Date: Definition of Binary field in control file
Next by Date: Re: Policy for stripping binaries
Previous by thread: Re: compressed binaries in packages, for or against?
Next by thread: Re: compressed binaries in packages, for or against?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread