debian-legal Mar 2016 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
According to www.virustotal.com, lists.debian.org are hosting attachment .DOC virus
Georgi Guninski
Re: [oss-security] According to www.virustotal.com, lists.debian.org are hosting attachment .DOC virus
Adam D. Barratt
Re: [oss-security] According to www.virustotal.com, lists.debian.org are hosting attachment .DOC virus
Cord Beermann
Re: [oss-security] According to www.virustotal.com, lists.debian.org are hosting attachment .DOC virus
Georgi Guninski
Message not available
Re: According to www.virustotal.com, lists.debian.org are hosting attachment .DOC virus
Georgi Guninski
Re: [oss-security] According to www.virustotal.com, lists.debian.org are hosting attachment .DOC virus
Luca Filipozzi
Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status
William Whyte
Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status
William Whyte
Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status
Ian Jackson
Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries
Florian Weimer
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries
Rytis
Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries
Ben Finney
Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries
Ben Finney
Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries
Ian Jackson
Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries
Ben Finney
Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries
Ian Jackson
Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries
Ben Finney
Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries
Tony Rutkowski
Re: Can "PDB" license be considered free ?
Bas Wijnen
Re: Can "PDB" license be considered free ?
Don Armstrong
libfcgi-perl copyright issue
Graham Knop
Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue
Paul Wise
Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue
Tony Rutkowski
Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue
Paul Wise
Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue
Ulrich Mueller
Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue
Tony Rutkowski
Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue
Tony Rutkowski
Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue
Riley Baird
WOMEN'SDAY Ce vendredi au Mas
Le Mas - 06 65 039 239
ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
Jerome BENOIT
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
MJ Ray
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
Jerome BENOIT
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
Riley Baird
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
Jerome BENOIT
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
Ben Finney
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
Charles Plessy
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
Jerome BENOIT
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
Jerome BENOIT
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
Riley Baird
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
Tony Rutkowski
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
Riley Baird
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
Thorsten Alteholz
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
Riley Baird
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? [IMPROVED VERSION]
Jerome BENOIT
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? [IMPROVED VERSION]
Ben Finney
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
Ben Finney
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
Ben Finney
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
Riley Baird
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
Ian Jackson
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
Ben Finney
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?
Ian Jackson
Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions
Ferenc Kovacs
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions
Ian Jackson
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? [IMPROVED VERSION] [Apache 2.0]
Jerome BENOIT
Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? [IMPROVED VERSION] [Apache 2.0]
Ben Finney
Missing license text in upstream packages
Sven Bartscher
Re: Missing license text in upstream packages
Riley Baird
Re: Missing license text in upstream packages
Sven Bartscher
Re: Missing license text in upstream packages
Ben Finney
Re: Missing license text in upstream packages
Ian Jackson
Re: Missing license text in upstream packages
Charles Plessy
Re: Missing license text in upstream packages
Sven Bartscher
Re: Missing license text in upstream packages
Riley Baird
Re: Missing license text in upstream packages
Ian Jackson
R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself
Mattia Rizzolo
Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself
Paul R. Tagliamonte
Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself
Mattia Rizzolo
Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself
Paul Wise
Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself
Ben Finney
Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself
Ben Finney
Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself
Mattia Rizzolo
Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself
Ben Finney
Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself
Mattia Rizzolo
Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself
Ben Finney
Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself
Mattia Rizzolo
Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself
Ben Finney
Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself
Charles Plessy
detail about license in duc package
hpfn
Re: detail about license in duc package
Walter Landry
Re: detail about license in duc package
Ben Finney
Re: detail about license in duc package
hpfn
Votre RDV du week-end
Le Mas - 06 65 039 239
Re: Re: Global IP Sound iLBC Public License, v2.0 - IETF Version
Kim Paflias
Re: Re: Global IP Sound iLBC Public License, v2.0 - IETF Version
Paul R. Tagliamonte
The last update was on 17:58 GMT Tue Mar 07. There are 84 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc