Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?

[Jerome BENOIT <calculus@rezozer.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256



On 11/03/16 21:15, Riley Baird wrote:
>>>> One of my package, nayty not to mention it [1], has a new
>>>> copyright notice [2] that is mean to be compatible.
>>>>
>>>> I am considering to migrate it to main: please can you confirm that
>>>> the new copyright notice is effectively DFSG-conformant.
> 
> That licence is fine.
> 
So now step forward in peace.

Thanks a lot for your prompt response,
Jerome
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW4z4sAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjlz0H/juOl/FisSOLcaewKPgHBC2o
kaE5V68yi1tgto9oRt87JLSy46ELRjmDuv0A0/AMMzofryGZIstZnrfP/uG20PFx
XG41Re9RsLt0NpEYZucZIRYqWMQe1w9/dSJ9eF6twRYjmZazQZTCQXSb3ZydDziR
DpKLCa1ivxYmOqsV6/l2GOTaFyueTLnOYWuQoaiUDVfj/BuNldt0Y4K49OuzKEqx
oaXaexk2Vg+fmOEzSEiezEEC46cLaRMptmJvgQtjrVrvrtNDUYxPxtBlzSHAdSGU
Tk0mHaUC8FU8SkZdwuFSVi7eE8vqUSkBTYvcCWgtxXpwl75CHf5heJcwRsiRODQ=
=Tu1v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----