[you forgot to CC me on this, anyway, I temporarly subscribed d-legal@]
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 07:52:18AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> writes:
>
> > Yes, I see how the MIT license is DFSG-free. What I'm saying is that
> > IMHO the only license requirement (the second paragraph of it that you
> > reported above, about including the copyright notice *and* the
> > permission notice in any copy of the software) is not fulfilled by R
> > packages.
>
> Thanks for clarifying.
>
> Can you point us to a representative source package that you think has
> this problem?
src:r-cran-praise (as of current version 1.0.0-1) is a good example.
As also pabs said [1] we should be good enough, but I'd prefer we could
drop the enough here.
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2016/03/msg00067.html
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature