debian-legal Nov 2009 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Are debian/ubuntu distributions "commercial applications" from a legal point of view? Re: Are debian/ubuntu distributions "commercial applications" from a legal point of view? bsd & modified bsd clarification Re: Re: Bug#532456: Are these licenses DFSG? Copyright information in new tuxcmd version compat/{crc.pas,md5.pas} Distro baseada en DEBIAN====Distribuicion basada en DEBIAN === Distro Based DEBIAN Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers GPL versions mismatch. Re: GR proposal: the AGPL does not meet the DFSG (take 2) How The Little Guy Can Make Big Money in Commercial Real Estate - Now! Re: Looking for +info about the license of a new package: Ossec Mixture of Code unter GPL-2+ and UnRAR license compatible? Re: [mt@debian.org: Re: RFS: php-clamav] opencore amr license, was: Bug#532456: Are these licenses DFSG? Re: RFS: spim Re: Search provider icons in web browsers Search provider icons in web browsers (was: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages) Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages The last update was on 16:48 GMT Wed May 01. There are 84 messages. Page 1 of 1.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc