debian-legal Nov 2009 by subject
|
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
|
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Are debian/ubuntu distributions "commercial applications" from a legal point of view?
Re: Are debian/ubuntu distributions "commercial applications" from a legal point of view?
bsd & modified bsd clarification
Re: Re: Bug#532456: Are these licenses DFSG?
Copyright information in new tuxcmd version compat/{crc.pas,md5.pas}
Distro baseada en DEBIAN====Distribuicion basada en DEBIAN === Distro Based DEBIAN
Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers
GPL versions mismatch.
Re: GR proposal: the AGPL does not meet the DFSG (take 2)
How The Little Guy Can Make Big Money in Commercial Real Estate - Now!
Re: Looking for +info about the license of a new package: Ossec
Mixture of Code unter GPL-2+ and UnRAR license compatible?
Re: [mt@debian.org: Re: RFS: php-clamav]
opencore amr license, was: Bug#532456: Are these licenses DFSG?
Re: RFS: spim
Re: Search provider icons in web browsers
Search provider icons in web browsers (was: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages)
Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
The last update was on 16:48 GMT Wed May 01. There are 84 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc