debian-legal Nov 2009 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Andrew M.A. Cater

Re: Are debian/ubuntu distributions "commercial applications" from a legal point of view? Nov 17

Anthony W. Youngman

Re: GPL versions mismatch. Nov 21
Re: GPL versions mismatch. Nov 19
Re: GPL versions mismatch. Nov 18
Re: GPL versions mismatch. Nov 23
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 30

Arnoud Engelfriet

Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 24

Ben Finney

Re: RFS: spim Nov 11
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 24
Re: GPL versions mismatch. Nov 20
Re: RFS: spim Nov 19
Re: RFS: spim Nov 11
Search provider icons in web browsers (was: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages) Nov 24
Re: RFS: spim Nov 12
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 24
Re: Search provider icons in web browsers Nov 24
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 24

Bill Allombert

Re: GR proposal: the AGPL does not meet the DFSG (take 2) Nov 17

Charles Plessy

Re: bsd & modified bsd clarification Nov 06
Re: bsd & modified bsd clarification Nov 06

CRE Triage Capital

How The Little Guy Can Make Big Money in Commercial Real Estate - Now! Nov 30

Don Armstrong

Re: bsd & modified bsd clarification Nov 05

Eion Robb

Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 24
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 17

Eugen Dedu

Re: Bug#532456: Are these licenses DFSG? Nov 10
Re: Re: Bug#532456: Are these licenses DFSG? Nov 10

Florian Weimer

Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers Nov 22
Re: Are debian/ubuntu distributions "commercial applications" from a legal point of view? Nov 19
Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers Nov 21

Francesco Poli

Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 14
Re: GR proposal: the AGPL does not meet the DFSG (take 2) Nov 20
Re: Mixture of Code unter GPL-2+ and UnRAR license compatible? Nov 30
Re: [mt@debian.org: Re: RFS: php-clamav] Nov 22
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 30

Gabriele Giacone

Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 24
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 23

Gilson

Distro baseada en DEBIAN====Distribuicion basada en DEBIAN === Distro Based DEBIAN Nov 02

Gunnar Wolf

Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 25
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 25

Jim Larus

RE: RFS: spim Nov 12
RE: RFS: spim Nov 12
RE: RFS: spim Nov 12

Joe Smith

Re: Looking for +info about the license of a new package: Ossec Nov 03
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 29

Jose Antonio Quevedo

Re: Looking for +info about the license of a new package: Ossec Nov 02
Re: Looking for +info about the license of a new package: Ossec Nov 01
Re: Looking for +info about the license of a new package: Ossec Nov 01
Re: Looking for +info about the license of a new package: Ossec Nov 02

Laszlo Lebrun

Luca Falavigna

Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 14

Mackenzie Morgan

Re: RFS: spim Nov 11

Matthias Klose

Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers Nov 22

Michael Below

Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 14

Michael Tautschnig

Re: [mt@debian.org: Re: RFS: php-clamav] Nov 22

Mike Hommey

Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 24
Re: Search provider icons in web browsers Nov 24
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 24
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 24
Re: Search provider icons in web browsers (was: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages) Nov 24

MJ Ray

Re: Are debian/ubuntu distributions "commercial applications" from a legal point of view? Nov 17

Paul Wise

Re: Looking for +info about the license of a new package: Ossec Nov 03
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 24
Re: RFS: spim Nov 12
Re: Bug#532456: Are these licenses DFSG? Nov 10
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages Nov 24
Re: Looking for +info about the license of a new package: Ossec Nov 01
Re: Looking for +info about the license of a new package: Ossec Nov 01
Re: Re: Bug#532456: Are these licenses DFSG? Nov 10

Penny Leach

bsd & modified bsd clarification Nov 05
Re: bsd & modified bsd clarification Nov 06

Reinhard Tartler

opencore amr license, was: Bug#532456: Are these licenses DFSG? Nov 11

Salvatore Bonaccorso

Mixture of Code unter GPL-2+ and UnRAR license compatible? Nov 27
Re: Copyright information in new tuxcmd version compat/{crc.pas,md5.pas} Nov 09
Re: Mixture of Code unter GPL-2+ and UnRAR license compatible? Nov 28
Copyright information in new tuxcmd version compat/{crc.pas,md5.pas} Nov 07

Steve Langasek

Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers Nov 20
Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers Nov 23

Raúl Sánchez Siles

GPL versions mismatch. Nov 17

Tomáš Bžatek

Re: Mixture of Code unter GPL-2+ and UnRAR license compatible? Nov 28

The last update was on 16:48 GMT Wed May 01. There are 84 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc