debian-devel Jan 2004 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 1 of 5 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
[no subject] (forw) Debconf abuse by several packages (not only) [custom]: (pre)configuring packages -Wall, preprocesor, const foo, and pointers /usr/X11R6/bin without read permission? 185 Packages that look orphaned 2.4.24 fixes local root exploit in 2.4.23 2.4.24 with exec-shield and SELinux << Returned mail >> ( why me?)[<>] 准确预测恒生指数期货!Predict the futures of Hang Seng Index accurately! Re: Suscríbete gratuitamente a psicomentarios revista virtual de psicología p03 [ANNOUNCE] cheetah uploaded to experimental (new packages) [ANNOUNCE] new fam version in experimental [Custom] Enterprise version. Re: [debian-devel] Hidden timeskew problems might show up on 2.6.x kernels Re: [debian-devel] Re: [debian-devel] Hidden timeskew problems might show up on 2.6.x kernels Re: [debian-devel] Re: [debian-devel] Re: [debian-devel] Hidden timeskew problems might show up on 2.6.x kernels Re: [debian-devel] Re: [debian-devel] Re: [debian-devel] Re: The stable/testing/unstable branches not a solution ? Re: [debian-devel] Re: [debian-devel] Re: fixing debconf stdin bug Re: [debian-devel] Re: [debian-devel] Re: SSP for Debian unstable. was Re: security enhanced debian branch? Re: [debian-devel] Re: [debian-devel] Re: The stable/testing/unstable branches not a solution ? Re: [debian-devel] Re: fixing debconf stdin bug Re: [debian-devel] Re: MIA, Incompetent and holiday-loving maintainers (was: Request for NMUs.) Re: [debian-devel] Re: SSP for Debian unstable. was Re: security enhanced debian branch? Re: [debian-devel] Re: The stable/testing/unstable branches not a solution ? Re: [debian-devel] Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-) [eSafe Mail] AntiVirus alert [Fwd: Webb.it 04 * call for papers] [leadership/opensource] invitation to online survey [mass bug filing] still depending on exim instead of exim4 [multiarch] Proposal for *-dev packages Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract [RFH] Time shortage, other issues Re: [zope] Zope packaging policy Re: Accepted apt 0.6.11 (i386 source all) Re: Accepted aptitude 0.2.13-2.2 (i386 source) Re: Accepted lynx-cur 2.8.5-17 (i386 source all) Re: Accepted netpbm-free 2:9.20-8.3 (i386 source) Advice on how best to handle non-backwards compatibility Re: ALERT - Virus W32/Mydoom@MM found; an attachment/message has been quarantined And next name after Sarge? or PROPOSAL for Codenames' election Anjuta IDE segfault on preferences menu Announce: buildd stats, infos, contacts ANNOUNCE: please test the new fetchmail package Re: Announcing type-handling APPEAL TO SUPPORT THE MOTHERLESS BABIES Re: apt 0.6 in experimental Apt and rsync... I know... apt experimental breaks w/ webcaching (was Re: apt 0.6 in experimental) Re: APT-like system for BOINC Re: apt-listchanges (Re: Advice on how best to handle non-backwards compatibility) apt-listchanges (Re: Advice on how best to handle non-backwards compatibility) Architecture distribution in Debian according to popcon Re: ATI Technologies Inc. Canada - Email submission Attempted Progress Report: Sarge Attempted sarge status report -- 2004/01/04 Autobuilders messed up dependencies of stable libpgperl automated response AWARD WINING NOTIFICATION. bad UDP packets sent to debian FTP mirrors Banesco detectó un virus enviado desde su correo electrónico bcrypt ? Be added to planet.debian.org Better defaults in /etc/hosts.allow, /etc/hosts.deny? (was Re: Fam mustn't depend on portmap (was Re: new portmap packages, testers wanted)) Re: Bits from the RM bootsplash as kernel binary module bootsplash in debian kernel Browsers which do not know how to handle mailto BTS slow? Re: bug #151273: linneighborhood: package name spelt wrong Bug #194195 prevents XFCE4 from entering testing Bug in linux-kernel-headers or in linux-wlan-ng? Bug triage for emacs20 Re: Bug#142944: fixing debconf stdin bug Bug#164842: I would like to adopt dcc Bug#183860: Just extra info. Re: Bug#183860: marked as done (general: many info files have license conflicts) Bug#183860: marked as done (many files generated from texinfo have license conflicts) Bug#183860: RMS's comment on this bug is mostly irrelevant. :-/ Bug#207389: ITP: canlock Re: Bug#219959: ITP: mozilla-locale-eu -- Mozilla Basque Language Package Re: Bug#224742 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#224742: Related to this issue...) Re: Bug#224742: Related to this issue... Re: Bug#224828: Split config file is worrying... Re: Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to notstart at boot, via debconf Re: Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf Re: Re: Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to notstart at boot, via debconf The last update was on 06:10 GMT Mon May 11. There are 2290 messages. Page 1 of 5.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 1 of 5
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc