[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#224742 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#224742: Related to this issue...)



On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 11:14:32PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Branden Robinson 
> 
> | On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 12:25:28PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> | > * Branden Robinson 
> | > | So, the "wontfix" tag is inapplicable to wishlist bugs by definition?
> | > 
> | > No, but the maintainer can choose to close the bug instead.
> | 
> | And he cannot make this choice with non-wishlist bugs?  Is it
> | inappropriate to close a non-wishlist bug instead of tagging it wontfix?
> 
> Yes, that's inappropriate, since it is a bug, but you say that it's
> not.  Wishlist bugs aren't bugs, they are wishlist requests.  If you
> tag a normal bug wontfix it means that you agree that it's a bug, but
> it won't be fixed (for instance due to design choices or other
> circumstances).
> 
> | How do you justify your answers to these questions using the existing
> | BTS documentation?
> 
> The BTS docs doesn't document how wishlist bugs should be handled very
> well, so it's mostly the maintainer's choice,and tradition which says
> how to handle wishlist requests.

Your statments are about what's inappropriate with regard to
NON-wishlist bugs.

Again, how do you justify your answers to these questions using the
existing BTS documentation?

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |    There is no housing shortage in
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    Lincoln today -- just a rumor that
branden@debian.org                 |    is put about by people who have
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    nowhere to live.    -- G. L. Murfin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: