Re: Bug#224742: Related to this issue...

To: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#224742: Related to this issue...
From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 10:49:57 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 261BE6AC-3C72-11D8-BEF5-00039317863E@suespammers.org>
In-reply-to: <20031229035907.GE14732@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net>
References: <20031226064359.GA23485@azure.humbug.org.au> <20031226161219.GA582@cs.unibo.it> <20031227020033.GB31627@azure.humbug.org.au> <878yky7azn.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net> <20031227153534.GA31165@projectcolo.org.uk> <87vfo1q1qj.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net> <20031228222627.GA1675@moregruel.net> <87y8swcy9e.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net> <20031229012751.GA14732@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net> <87isk0nzgg.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net> <20031229035907.GE14732@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net>

On Dec 28, 2003, at 22:59, Steve Langasek wrote:

The principle is that of optimizing for the common case.  I as
maintainer spend a lot more time referencing the BTS page for mypackage
than all the people interested in a particular wontfix-wishlist;

How about this: tag the bug wontfix and close it. Then the maintainerkeeps his uncluttered default view, and people who want to see rejectedwishlist bugs can easily search for them.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#224742: Related to this issue...
  - From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: MIA, Incompetent and holiday-loving maintainers (was: Request for NMUs.)
Next by Date: Re: apt 0.6 in experimental
Previous by thread: Re: Request for NMUs.
Next by thread: Re: Bug#224742: Related to this issue...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread