On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 02:19:17AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 03:30:25AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > This needs to be taken up with upstream to see if it's an actual problem, > > > and what solutions are possible. > > Don't we generally leave bugs *open* while we confirm such things with > > upstream (perhaps tagging them "moreinfo" in the meantime)? > > It's not appropriate to keep bugs that aren't even confirmed to *exist* > open forever. I'm puzzled. I don't see where the word "forever" appeared in my question. On the contrary, ephemerality was clearly expressed. -- G. Branden Robinson | If you're handsome, it's flirting. Debian GNU/Linux | If you're a troll, it's sexual branden@debian.org | harassment. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- George Carlin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature