debian-legal Jan 2005 by date
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[
previous page
]
Page 3 of 3
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Thread Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Jan 29
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Walter Landry
Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works?
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Raul Miller
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Raul Miller
Re: License questions
MJ Ray
Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works?
Raul Miller
Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works?
Raul Miller
Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works?
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Illustrating JVM bindings
Michael K. Edwards
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Lewis Jardine
Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works?
Andrew Suffield
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Raul Miller
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Dalibor Topic
Re: D-Link wireless adapter firmware
Marco d'Itri
Re: [Pkg-alsa-devel] RFS: alsa-tools
Marco d'Itri
Re: Taking a position on anti-patent licenses
Nathanael Nerode
Re: Need to Identify Contributions and the Dissident Test
Nathanael Nerode
Re: GPL - "specifying" the preferred form for modification
Nathanael Nerode
Re: GPL - "specifying" the preferred form for modification
Glenn Maynard
Jan 30
Re: Bug#289856: mdnsresponder: Wrong license
Jeff Waugh
Re: Need to Identify Contributions and the Dissident Test
Francesco Poli
Re: Taking a position on anti-patent licenses
Francesco Poli
The Nutch Software License
Luca Brivio
Re: The Nutch Software License
Matthew Garrett
Re: The Nutch Software License
Luca Brivio
Jan 31
Re: D-Link wireless adapter firmware
Andrew Suffield
Re: Taking a position on anti-patent licenses
Andrew Suffield
Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works?
Frank Küster
Re: GPL - "specifying" the preferred form for modification
Frank Küster
Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works?
Frank Küster
Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works?
Josh Triplett
Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works?
Frank Küster
Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works?
Raul Miller
Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works?
MJ Ray
Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works?
MJ Ray
Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works?
Frank Küster
Re: GPL as a license for documentation: What about derived works?
Frank Küster
Re: The Nutch Software License
Glenn Maynard
Re: The Nutch Software License
Luca Brivio
Re: The Nutch Software License
Glenn Maynard
anonymity and copyright in the U.S. (was: Need to Identify Contributions and the Dissident Test)
Branden Robinson
Re: Taking a position on anti-patent licenses
Glenn Maynard
a right to privacy is not in the DFSG, therfore you don't have one
Branden Robinson
Re: anonymity and copyright in the U.S. (was: Need to Identify Contributions and the Dissident Test)
Don Armstrong
Re: a right to privacy is not in the DFSG, therfore you don't have one
Glenn Maynard
Re: a right to privacy is not in the DFSG, therfore you don't have one
Joel Aelwyn
Re: anonymity and copyright in the U.S. (was: Need to Identify Contributions and the Dissident Test)
Francesco Poli
Feb 01
Re: The Nutch Software License
Luca Brivio
Re: [Pkg-alsa-devel] RFS: alsa-tools
Walter Landry
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Walter Landry
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Walter Landry
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Michael Poole
Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe
Walter Landry
The last update was on 08:32 GMT Sun May 19. There are 1053 messages. Page 3 of 3.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[
previous page
]
Page 3 of 3
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Thread Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc