debian-policy Jun 2000 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Re: unusable examples in apckages ...
Nicolás Lichtmaier
Re: unusable examples in apckages ...
Sven LUTHER
Re: Virtual packages (was Re: Bug#64006:)
Santiago Vila
Re: Virtual packages (was Re: Bug#64006:)
Julian Gilbey
Re: Virtual packages (was Re: Bug#64006:)
Santiago Vila
Re: Virtual packages (was Re: Bug#64006:)
Julian Gilbey
Re: Virtual packages (was Re: Bug#64006:)
Santiago Vila
Bug#64437: PROPOSED] Must/Should/May in policy
Anthony Towns
Processed: Re: Bug#64437: PROPOSED] Must/Should/May in policy
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#64437: PROPOSED] Must/Should/May in policy
Peter Samuelson
Bug#61058: marked as done (FHS: /usr/local/share/man instead of /usr/local/man ?)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: reopen FHS bug report
Debian Bug Tracking System
Updating policy
Julian Gilbey
Moving doc section of policy and packaging manuals
Julian Gilbey
Re: Moving doc section of policy and packaging manuals
Chris Waters
proposal: treat plugins and shared libraries differently
David Benson
Re: proposal: treat plugins and shared libraries differently
Edward Betts
Re: proposal: treat plugins and shared libraries differently
David Benson
Re: proposal: treat plugins and shared libraries differently
Julian Gilbey
Bug#65577: [PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution
Taketoshi Sano
Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution
Brian Mays
Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution
Taketoshi Sano
Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution
Brian Mays
Re: Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution
C. Cooke
Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution
Brian Mays
Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution
Josip Rodin
Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution
Anthony Towns
Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution
Brian Mays
Bug#65577: Amended] copyright should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution
Taketoshi Sano
Re: Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution
Jean-Christophe Dubacq
Parseable copyright files (was: Re: Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution)
Julian Gilbey
Re: Parseable copyright files (was: Re: Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution)
Chris Waters
Re: Parseable copyright files (was: Re: Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution)
Julian Gilbey
Re: Parseable copyright files (was: Re: Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution)
Brian F. Kimball
Re: Parseable copyright files (was: Re: Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution)
Chris Waters
Re: Parseable copyright files
Herbert Xu
Re: Parseable copyright files
Julian Gilbey
Re: Parseable copyright files
Chris Waters
Re: Parseable copyright files
Peter S Galbraith
Re: Parseable copyright files (was: Re: Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution)
Brian May
Re: Parseable copyright files (was: Re: Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution)
Joey Hess
Bug#65578: [PROPOSED] extra-Debian packages should have extra Priority
Taketoshi Sano
ISO 8601
Eduardo
Re: ISO 8601
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#65764: changelog shouldn't be in the copyright file
Josip Rodin
Bug#65764: changelog shouldn't be in the copyright file
Brian Mays
Bug#65764: changelog shouldn't be in the copyright file
Josip Rodin
Bug#65764: changelog shouldn't be in the copyright file
Brian Mays
Bug#65764: changelog shouldn't be in the copyright file
Steve Greenland
Bug#65764: changelog shouldn't be in the copyright file
Brian Mays
Message not available
Bug#65764: changelog shouldn't be in the copyright file
Brian Mays
Bug#65764: changelog shouldn't be in the copyright file
Steve Greenland
Bug#65764: changelog shouldn't be in the copyright file
Brian Mays
Bug#65764: changelog shouldn't be in the copyright file
Josip Rodin
Bug#65764: changelog shouldn't be in the copyright file
Brian Mays
Bug#65765: a needless paragraph
Josip Rodin
Bug#65847: packaging-manual: no mention of Build-Depends in chapter 4
Julian Gilbey
Bug#65764: my thoughts
Bdale Garbee
Bug#65764: my thoughts
Ben Collins
Bug#65764: my thoughts
Joey Hess
Bug#65764: my thoughts
Julian Gilbey
Bug#61058: FHS: /usr/local/share/man instead of /usr/local/man ?
Julian Gilbey
Bug#61058: FHS: /usr/local/share/man instead of /usr/local/man ?
Daniel Quinlan
CVS jdg: Add fhs-2.1 to source package
debian-policy
Bug#11094: Policy should mention that serial lines require UUCP-style locking
Julian Gilbey
Bug#11094: Policy should mention that serial lines require UUCP-style locking
John Goerzen
Bug#45406: marked as done ([REJECTED] Config files must have manpages)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#13353: marked as done ([OLD PROPOSAL] Keywords field for packages)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: Bug#45406: [PROPOSAL] Config files must have manpages
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#23661: usr/doc should not be accessible through http servers by default
Julian Gilbey
Bug#23661: usr/doc should not be accessible through http servers by default
Marco d'Itri
Bug#23661: usr/doc should not be accessible through http servers by default
Petr Cech
Bug#23661: usr/doc should not be accessible through http servers by default
Chris Waters
Bug#23661: usr/doc should not be accessible through http servers by default
Raul Miller
Bug#23661: usr/doc should not be accessible through http servers by default
Julian Gilbey
Bug#23661: usr/doc should not be accessible through http servers by default
Raul Miller
Re: Bug#23661: usr/doc should not be accessible through http servers by default
Steve Robbins
Bug#23661: usr/doc should not be accessible through http servers by default
Julian Gilbey
Bug#23661: usr/doc should not be accessible through http servers by default
Martin Schulze
Bug#23661: usr/doc should not be accessible through http servers by default
Turbo Fredriksson
Bug#22935: PROPOSED] Do not make hardlinks to conffiles
Julian Gilbey
Bug#22935: PROPOSED] Do not make hardlinks to conffiles
Anthony Towns
Bug#22935: PROPOSED] Do not make hardlinks to conffiles
Julian Gilbey
Bug#22935: PROPOSED] Do not make hardlinks to conffiles
Chris Waters
Bug#22935: PROPOSED] Do not make hardlinks to conffiles
Julian Gilbey
Bug#22935: PROPOSED] Do not make hardlinks to conffiles
Steve Greenland
Bug#22935: PROPOSED] Do not make hardlinks to conffiles
Julian Gilbey
Bug#22935: PROPOSED] Do not make hardlinks to conffiles
Chris Waters
Bug#22935: PROPOSED] Do not make hardlinks to conffiles
Julian Gilbey
Bug#22935: PROPOSED] Do not make hardlinks to conffiles
Ron
Bug#21585: marked as done ([REJECTED] /etc/init.d/<script> need not be a conffile if actively maintained)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#25533: marked as done ([OLD PROPOSAL] Debian-policy should probably contain the FHS standard)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: Reopening important policy proposals
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#26159: marked as done ([OLD PROPOSAL] Contact address for virtual package name list)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#25882: U/gid 100 should be statically allocated
Julian Gilbey
CVS jdg: Renumbered version to 3.2.0.0
debian-policy
Bug#27137: REJECTED] Clarification of non-free: packages encouraging donations with claims about non-donation
Julian Gilbey
Bug#30036: OLD PROPOSAL] Including subpolicies (emacs, menu etc) in policy
Julian Gilbey
Bug#30036: OLD PROPOSAL] Including subpolicies (emacs, menu etc) in policy
Adam Heath
Bug#30036: OLD PROPOSAL] Including subpolicies (emacs, menu etc) in policy
Josip Rodin
Bug#26915: marked as done ([OLD PROPOSAL] Debian Logo License)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#27205: marked as done ([REJECTED] Daemons should run as root only if really needed)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Bug#27205: marked as done ([REJECTED] Daemons should run as root only if really needed)
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#27205: marked as done ([REJECTED] Daemons should run as root only if really needed)
Julian Gilbey
Processed: Re: Bug#27205: marked as done ([REJECTED] Daemons should run as root only if really needed)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#27869: marked as done ([REJECTED] Icon location policy)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#29770: marked as done ([REJECTED] Differentiate between conffile and configuration file in policy)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#30122: marked as done ([REJECTED] Fix bad advice about conffile management)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Q about Build-Depends vs Build-Depends-Indep
Julian Gilbey
Re: Q about Build-Depends vs Build-Depends-Indep
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Bug#66023: [PROPOSAL] Treat plugins and shared libraries differently
Julian Gilbey
Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Treat plugins and shared libraries differently
Josip Rodin
Bug#33826: REJECTED] Policy should discuss '.sh' suffixes on /etc/init.d files
Julian Gilbey
Bug#34610: OLD PROPOSAL] unsuffixed shared libraries
Julian Gilbey
Processed: Bug#34610: [OLD PROPOSAL] unsuffixed shared libraries
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#36151: REJECTED] /etc/init.d scripts should specify an explicit PATH
Julian Gilbey
Bug#36151: REJECTED] /etc/init.d scripts should specify an explicit PATH
Alexander Koch
Bug#36151: REJECTED] /etc/init.d scripts should specify an explicit PATH
Brock Rozen
Bug#36151: REJECTED] /etc/init.d scripts should specify an explicit PATH
Brock Rozen
Bug#36151: REJECTED] /etc/init.d scripts should specify an explicit PATH
Steve Greenland
Bug#31441: marked as done ([REJECTED] Require both fcntl() and dotlock mailbox locking to prevent mail loss)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#32263: marked as done ([OLD PROPOSAL] Split /cgi-bin/ into system and local parts)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#34046: marked as done ([REJECTED] runlevels policy: xdm should not be started in all multi-user runlevels by default)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#34652: marked as done (Policy is not clear enough about nawk.)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#35510: marked as done ([OLD PROPOSAL] mirror license seems Debian-specific)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#36619: marked as done ([REJECTED] Allowable values of PAGER variable should be described in policy)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#43529: marked as done (debian-policy: mail locking in Debian is _not_ NFS safe)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: retitle again.
Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: 'editor' alternative policy?
Jordi Mallach
Re: 'editor' alternative policy?
Steve Greenland
Re: 'editor' alternative policy?
Jordi Mallach
Re: 'editor' alternative policy?
Steve Greenland
Re: 'editor' alternative policy?
Carl R. Witty
Re: 'editor' alternative policy?
Steve Greenland
Bug#37251: marked as done ([REJECTED] Software depending on non-US)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#37262: marked as done ([REJECTED] Software depending on non-US)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#32263: Splitting cgi-bin
Brian White
Processed: Splitting cgi-bin
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#32263: Splitting cgi-bin
Julian Gilbey
Processed: Re: Bug#32263: Splitting cgi-bin
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: change proposal severity
Debian Bug Tracking System
CVS jdg: * Added FHS details to copyright file
debian-policy
Bug#38612: marked as done ([PROPOSED] Have proposal-submitting guidelines in policy package)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#39408: marked as done (Policy self-reference broken)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#38902: Reassign bug to ftp.debian.org
Julian Gilbey
Processed: Reassign bug to ftp.debian.org
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#37999: OLD PROPOSAL]: A pre-install required space checking mechanism for Debian packages
Julian Gilbey
Bug#37999: OLD PROPOSAL]: A pre-install required space checking mechanism for Debian packages
Jason Gunthorpe
Bug#38703: marked as done ([OLD PROPOSAL] A better way to configure debian systems)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: Retitle bug (2nd attempt)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: Re: Bug#66357: No MD5sums for (most) base files
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: RC downgrades
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#66357: marked as done (No MD5sums for (most) base files)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#66535: proposal of virtual package: syslogd
Arthur Korn
Processed: fix submitter address
Debian Bug Tracking System
The last update was on 10:41 GMT Sat May 11. There are 155 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc